macmac

No, we were not "considered both monkeys". Monkeys and humans share an ancestor that was not a monkey or a human.

Could you expand on what you mean by:

> The divergence must've happened down the hill somewhere. So, in the eyes of those in the future, we may or may not remain human.

I really cannot make sense of this.

The US UK extradition treaty is a product of post 9/11 and comically imbalanced as persons may be extradited from the UK to the US for crimes committed in the UK which would be a crime in the US but not the opposite. See further: https://www.stokoepartnership.com/bambos-tsiattalou-discusse...

It used to have an overhang with a net at one end. I found that slightly disconcerting.

You can contact me here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/martinalbertclausen/

Thanks

I have some experience with contract management but I would need to understand the scenario better to offer any meaningful advice. Is the change tracking for the negotiation process, are the contracts bespoke or based on some standard, what are the management requirements after signature etc. Feel free to DM me.

Unfortunately you have to accept full surveillance mode (including which websites you visit) to run the required Windows 10 Insiders Dev version of Windows to test this.

Those are separate problems. Weather can become more extreme without becoming more unpredictable.

Me too. Especially if we compensate for the sharp increase in the quality of prediction and observation technology.

Looking at the graphs and knowing how much they are affected by any one major casualty I don't find the hypothesis that many more boxes are being lost due to vessels operating at capacity very well documented.

They often stay floating for months.

Unfortunately not many goods survive the experience.

Yes, but they primarily service the USN.

Interesting to note that the US only really has one container shipping line: Matson. It is an insignificant carrier in terms of capacity (less than 0.5 % world market share) which primarily services Hawaii.

For now unfortunately you have to turn on "Optional diagnostic data" - aka "full spy mode" - to access this feature.

Ironically the link to Knuth's website found in the References [1] is broken due to a linebreak in the url.

So much bitter.

libreboot.org is not reachable at the momement.

"Tweet More by Hiding Distractions" - seems like a contradiction in terms.

I would agree with all of these points except "pattern matching". Yes several libraries implement it, but it is not built in and even the best libraries feel clunky compared to for instance the built in destructuring. Rich explicitly rejected pattern matching ala ML for the reasons provided here: https://gist.github.com/reborg/dc8b0c96c397a56668905e2767fd6...

The text rendering seems very poor. Is that an artefact of the font used, the platform or something else?

This is just an extension of the fairly common Russian idea, that the West and Americans in particular are weak, mostly because they do not face hardship of any real kind.

Great move.

I would respectfully recommend that you read "Getting to Yes" by Roger Fisher and William Ury. Effective negotiation is often about expressing interests, not specific actions or ultimative positions.

This is very reminiscent of the Readable Lisp S-expressions Project https://readable.sourceforge.io/

High Court judge, not that it makes a huge difference.

> There are no side-effects

Yet it prints stuff to the terminal.

No, I agree. I was pointing out a general challenge with the EPL that people tend to overlook. In the Clojure environment many use EPL for Clojure libraries, many without realising that it might, depending on your intentions, be an issue.

The problem with the EPL is that if your software is a derivative work of EPL licensed software, the EPL applies your software, including the obligation to provide access to the source of your software to the entities to which it is distributed. Determining if a work is a derivative work in software is far from straightforward. The EPL FAQ for instance points out that this might be an issue when using software that generates code.

That is not my experience. For instance right now there are several posts regarding the EU Court ruling on Safe Harbour. And it does not explain where the points the post had already got have gone.