1,894 karma · joined December 21, 2007
"Follow the Money" is incredibly prescient and "Warrior" is fundamentally exciting.
If that was the case the article would probably have contained at least a sliver of evidence. "Oh, but you just need a healthier relationship with evidence." Apparently a relationship which leads you to entertaining propositions for which there is none.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...
Not a good sign.
I believe the author is misreading this definition.
> "First, consider that most languages have a primitive datatype for strings of text"
The defintion says "data structure", not "datatype". A string is a datatype, not a datastructure.
> "Second, for most languages, it is possible to write a parser in that language itself, that stores the resulting abstract syntax tree in a primitive type in the language."
This is completely besides the point as the definition references the "primary representation", not a represenation that can be built using a parser.
This does not match my experience. I have worked in law for 20 years and hired (and fired) many lawyers for top tier companies. I saw some variant of an IQ tests for every one of them. As general rule they were not impressive and significantly below the scores we saw for programmers. The verbal comprehension was generally solid or better, the others not so much.