74 karma · joined August 16, 2019
On one side there's the union of opposites where without death there can be no life, without pain no pleasure, etc.
Then there's the scientist approach which just wants to reverse engineer life and increasing life span/quality.
I sympathize with both sides. I think someone like Kurzweil is doing too much and blinded by hope and that his idea of the future halfway sounds like hell but at the same time I think a lot could be gained by say doubling life expectancy and there's no need for any metaphysics.
I've been working on an android app and use gradle with the kotlin dsl. I haven't really done any programming with the build steps but this is pretty sexy and doesn't need three open/close tags every plugin.
dependencies {
implementation(fileTree(mapOf("dir" to "libs", "include" to listOf("*.jar"))))
implementation("com.google.android.material:material:1.2.0")
Gradle used to use groovy dsl, but with kotlin the syntax is more consistent and auto complete is actually useful.I know the basics of chef/ansible etc but I much prefer traditional dev.
The notation feels c like.
Maybe it could be interesting for knots and complicated algebraic geometry?
If I'm working within a system I like to code the minimum golden path, add a tests that passes, then add more checks or a new test and go back to the code, etc. Usually the constraints of the system point the way to an obvious skeletal implementation and you can learn as you go along.
On a greenfield project it is especially valuable to have discussions beforehand if people have done something similar before but talking about code at a high level tends to become nebulous rather quickly.
I wonder how dynamic programming fits into all this and when people started to investigate classic problems ala knapsack.
The older I get the easier it is to predict the end result of an activity and the easier it is to not start things that won't produce long term fulfilment.
There's many problems with the platonic world of ideals and a long history of arguments and counter arguments, but definitely nothing is settled and most working mathematicians have an intuitive feeling of platonism and that there is a 'right' solution to be found out there.