madmulita

It should read "UN, tired of so much success, attacks the real problems"

Do I need a standard library to learn how to implement a language?

Our objectives might, and most probably will, be different.

Now we need one that detects and filters AI narrators.

How would you know what to buy without ads?!

Don't give them ideas! I can already see the useless AI key next to Fn in my next keyboard.

Add a couple of pedestrians to that parking lot, as in a mall, and that situation turns dangerous quickly.

What do you mean "My TV"?

"He is holding it wrong"

How would a malfunctioning AI decide it's safe to stop?

"Best Viewed With Internet Explorer"

One huge problem is you then have to deal with IBM.

It is not fast but very interesting:

https://www.youtube.com/@DrMattRegan/

Funny how not enforced laws push to more laws.

You mean that they can make the corn unavailable in the middle of my dinner?

Is it? If I'm not mistaken this is exactly what journal editors, and reviewers, claim each and every time a new scandal blows up.

Let's stop pretending "peer-reviewed" means anything, please.

I believe the real reason for its survivability is the fact that you can pull a tape from the seventies and those binaries will run without any modification. It's not only that you can easily recompile your COBOL from the '70s, the binary is still compatible. You've never been pushed to migrate to another technology. Imagine the effort and 'knowledge' included in those evolved programs. The banks don't even know, and are conscious of it, how many laws and regulations they have encoded in there.

As someone stated in another comment, the software is the impressive part.

Until they decide this remote machine can only be accessed from properly secured devices...

In [1] Stéphan Graber, lxd project lead, regularly demos new features.

https://www.youtube.com/@LXD https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/introduction/

It's GNU/C/C++ !!!

Haven't seen anything showing non-copyleft licensed code not being used, only their word for it.

How does a company using GH for their closed source code know it's not being used in training, good faith?

Of course you can't blindly restore, but it seems that's what they 'test'. Either they are completely incompetent or they don't test the real procedure.

They claim they test backups quarterly yet they don't have a procedure in place to restore the operation. We all know your backup is not tested until you restored everything successfully. This is not an engineering mistake, it is a flat out lie.

Tl;dr stop voting Peronismo!

"On how I learned 'recursion'"

Welcome to Peronistan.

Lucky you, I'm in Peronistan.

"Sorry, WaterBear is not available in your country yet but we hope to be there soon!"

I guess I'll keep pirating.