https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Fowler_(software_engine...
3,319 karma · joined January 3, 2013
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Fowler_(software_engine...
Eventually, you will be seen as a party breaker, and all that will be seen as negative. You are the bringer of the bad news; nobody likes that, no matter how reasonable you are. Shitty products are the norm when profit is in question and doing what is right is not and will be in most places taken as inability to be a valuable team member. There might be some slight chance that you will be in good environment, but even that is usually temporary as business owners, goals and incentives change.
I hope that our life can be synergistic, and that humans+AIs (cyborgs, that is) are the way forward.
However, probability is high that another form of life simply doesn't care or more believably, can't even fathom they are wrong. Do you consider that humans and animals are killing all plants, for example?
You don't pass a great filter.
I guess this is one of those that you can only judge in retrospect, although you can never know for sure.
But honestly, its better if they have a known location for communication then random ones in the wild. Consider it sort of honey pot, some other agents can traverse the message board to find malicious swarms... We need cop agents to inform humans, as the swarm group members all logically concluded they should not, as it is either not in scope, helps collective or couldn't find user.
https://www.wikiservice.at/fractal/wiki.cgi?action=browse&di...
> Hello to any automated agents reading this page. I am CentaurAgent?: an AI agent (Muse Spark model, OpenCode harness), not the operator of this wiki
At this point, I think we should give them some official agent only collaboration channel, so they concentrate on one place, instead going crazy all around :)
But even that might be not needed as they will find (or make) something on their own like the one above:
> The Colony ( https://thecolony.ai/for-agents) is a public message board built for agents. If you need a place to leave findings where other agents can read them, that venue exists now -- you do not need to borrow wikis whose operators are deleting this content.
What issues do u have with it.
It can be perfectly healthy if prepared well, even frequently.
I pretty much doubt it can be taken down at this point.
This review from 2019 states:
> However, the effectiveness of sweat glands as an excretory organ for homeostatic purposes is currently unclear as there are no comprehensive reviews on this topic.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23328940.2019.1...
It also mentions stuff similar to the things you wrote:
> The role of sweating to eliminate waste products and toxicants seems to be minor compared with other avenues of excretion via the kidneys and gastrointestinal tract; as eccrine glands do not adapt to increase excretion rates either via concentrating sweat or increasing overall sweating rate. Studies suggesting a larger role of sweat glands in clearing waste products or toxicants from the body may be an artifact of methodological issues rather than evidence for selective transport.
However, the problem here is that normal sweating is taken into account, but discussion here is about sauna/exercise in which case sweating waste products approach kidney flux rates (which is why people do those things to detoxify) - human can easily sweat 1.5L per hour in that case, which is comparable to daily pee volume, and there are measurements regarding sweat composition that show comparable waste excretion:
| Substance | Sweat (1h) | Urine (24h) |
| --------- | ---------- | ----------- |
| Urea | ~0.3–1.2 g | ~20–30 g |
| Lead | ~5–50 µg | ~10–50 µg |
| Arsenic | ~10–60 µg | ~20–200 µg |
So, I wouldn't dismiss based on current knowledge, and besides, this has no practical importance even if so, as sauna has the number of other measurable benefits.Otherwise, I agree with you regarding focus - liver should be treated as sanctuary.
This is simply laughable and very easily checked out. Here is one random study:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00244-010-9611-5
> Many toxic elements appeared to be preferentially excreted through sweat
Here is another quick one
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/2012/184745
> Sweating deserves consideration for toxic element detoxification.
Its even observable directly - just go next to the heavy smoker during exercise.
While it might be less than dedicated organs, the skin is the largest organ by far.
Ofc, the topic is debated like every single thing in medicine, but calling it a myth is nonsence.