1,768 karma · joined April 2, 2008
Hello from Portland, Ore.
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/malbiniak; my proof: https://keybase.io/malbiniak/sigs/xgi5ehAANlk7LXLF89MWi98XXVNAXaHxtlFeAlJo2ho ]
I've done BI/BA work with an agency for major big box retailers (let's call them HomeBuyColaCo). You'd think they'd be monetizing the poop out of that data, but they're not using the data anywhere to the level they could be, should be, or most people think they are.
You listening, Groupon? ;)
Do you think Buzz could replace your FF usage, or do you think they're serving different purposes?
Om's content is far better than the other 2, but that's just my opinion.
Good points on the user base, too. According to Compete data for November, Facebook is pulling in south of 130M unique visitors/month, and Twitter is pulling in around 22M. By comparison, Foursquare is pulling around 368K, Brightkite is around 228K, and Gowalla nearing 80K. Amazing what downtime in an airport can get you ;)
There seems to be some evidence that users are willing to share their location with micro-conversations (the reason Mashable called Foursquare the Twitter of 2010), but unlike Twitter, none of these guys have really robust APIs built out. Hell, Gowalla still doesn't have one, and Foursquare only let's you grab at per-user data, not per-location (beyond 3h).
I'm anxiously watching to see which network grabs the most users, and have my fingers crossed that the winner will have a way for the ecosystem around it to develop. Maybe it will be Twitter w/ Geo, but does that assume users will change their behavior and start using Twitter more while mobile? (see: Twitter usage over weekends. Most of the usage is us bored at work)
but what does google have to gain? extend google maps/local? aren't they already scraping reviews and ratings? screw the "don't be evil," what's in it for them...especially at $500M?
and as a random peanut gallery jab, it kills me how "past the term sheet stage" indicates an 80% probability. isn't anything past .01% "past the term sheet stage?"
in my opinion, this article is answering the question "what makes a city easier to find vc money." we really need to break the mentality that palo alto and boulder are the only places where technology and web-based startups can go to market.
Is there anyone within the travel industry that can speak to the market demand for this? Does this cost the airlines $x/year, or booking services?
If the app isn't to our internal standards, we'll do whatever it takes to get there, even if it pushes us over budget (ie, staying up until 4am).
I'm also a little surprised by the author's criticism of having no one logged on at the same time. In our limited application of it, the value is not exclusively in real time communication, but in a better organized (non-linear) communication timeline.
http://www.ad-tech.com/chicago/session_detail.asp?refad=1...
But if you start smoking because of an online poll, you should reassess your decision making process.
But yes, rad nonetheless.
Point number #2? High5. Well put.
i'd recommend avoiding treasure island.
somewhat related, scratch the north bay off your list. i never was able to find a cheap way to commute from there.
And please - hold it against a business for trying to add additional revenue? How's your balance sheet?