masihyeganeh

No no, I can't find a reason to use a highly configurable tiling manager tool for that. Something like Moom will do the job. But then I can't find a reason to have more than two windows in a viewport

If you ask me, this will cause more distraction than being productive. In your example, would Slack be needed all the time, so it would worth keeping a quarter of the screen? Then IDEs for example have a lot of menus, panes, buttons and everything. You would have much less space for the actual code if you not have it in full screen mode. It might be personal style, but I find having 3 full screen windows and swtiching between them (with the most used, browser, in the middle) with a quick swipe is the most productive.

I don't get it. Why anyone would need to use tile manager in macOS? How often do you need to have apps side by side? In most cases, just making the app full screen and switch between windows with 4 finger swipes does the job beautifully. Enlighten me please

It's just a lie. Don't fall for the propaganda of the regime

I don't see the update yet. Haven't it provided ways to add a more advanced OPT yet? E.g. more digits, different hashing algorithm, different interval, ...?

It's a shame that it does not support them.

This comparison is unfair. In C# code it's using foreach loop over generic list which is ~4 time slower than for loop over array, but in C++ code it's using pointers (correct me if I'm wrong. I'm not a C++ ninja) which is fastest loop