>Advertising wondrous things.
This line bangs
2,247 karma · joined March 26, 2013
>Advertising wondrous things.
This line bangs
Very topical example of why these "benevolent censorship" schemes are are worse than the problem they are trying to fix.
Large, also reusable containers.
That was debunked this summer.
Distributing sexual images of someone without their consent is a clear crime against that person. Children can not consent.
For a role like this, where outsized skill of someone who is and needs to be elite should be rewarded with enormously outsized pay, I think this a good model.
Suppose your company also has a team that inspects public bridges to make sure they don't collapse.
Is it really altruistic, or given your market share is it a cost of business?
Marked down for spreading alternative facts.
Losing an argument? Better accuse the other side of being paid shills.
Better have the The Verge write a puff piece on them.
The oil field boom in ND didn't have a problem getting skilled workers from across the country to live in tents because they paid them well.
They AL farmers are not worried about finding workers, they want to lowball American laborers so they can throw their hands the air and claim that they need a supply of immigrants laborers, which they can exploit.
It's part of living in a free society, which means you have the right to do what you want by default.
So by default, yes, you have that right to free exchange of goods and services.
This is already not true for independent auto repair shops. Manufacturer specific computer diagnostic tools can cost them tens of thousands each and often they don't have the same level of tools as the dealers.
Based on your downvotes, it seems that people on HN think that fiction can prove economic theory.