364 karma · joined July 14, 2025
It was in the context of if someone would invent this technology. To which then the question was what advantage does this have.
Now going and posing the question wheter this is realistic or feasible is making this argumentation circular.
Alternatively I had the idea of something that automatically syncs your current working progress similar to how Word and Excel autosave work. With a main "branch" thats never developed in and will only be merged into from synced streams. But that idea is nowhere near cooked out yet.
But has notable exceptions that can be made uppon federal law. The burden for these is supposed to be pretty high.
I think this should not happen willy nilly. And if thats the case in the US I am obviously against it.
It is a complex multi layered subject because it has to weigh the rights of multiple people against each other.
I am fundamentally against spyware that constantly monitors you and reports anything. Because of the constant and pre crime nature of it.
On the other hand i am actually not fundamentally against turning over data when independent judges sign a warrant.
This is arguably a very tight rope to walk but i think thats the most realistic comporomise between my right to privacy and the right of others to get justice when something is done onto them.
Fundamentally space travel is not save, it cannot be (atleast at our Technological level) Space is unimaginably hostile to life. We cannot reduce this danger to zero.
I remember back when I lived in Berlin and studied planetary Science there. One of the Professors calculated and predicted where one of those Meteors is gonna go down. So people went there and watched and photographed it. Afterwards there was a little bit of an all hands on deck where a lot of students with different Professors went out and searched for the remains of the meteorite.