384 karma · joined July 2, 2025
Since Bitcoin is software anyone can fork it and create a currency y with the same ledger up to the fork but few people do because convincing other people to trade for it without a very strong argument is hard.
There was a whole thread the other day about a framework for smuggling these huge analytics bundles through content blockers. Funny it was just around the same time another large thread was on the front page full of marketing people spazing out over the low click through rate when people are given AI summaries and aren't forced to "experience" these corporate sites running on their computers.
IMO common law is still better than case law at least.
It's possible to imagine drawing extra thick lines by modifying the algorithm but the equivalent changes to a curve would leave gaps. I suppose you could figure out how eg boundary paths for beziers are calculated and transform your algorithm so each step draws to the boundary. It seems like more work for something less general than filling though.
The ones who plan ahead tend to not end up in these organizations to begin with since they have leeway to say no much earlier.
I don't think the real estate situation helps but I think there's a deeper social problem driving both of those effects.
Unions could only make that worse.
No one has a good benchmark for what AGI is. Already LLMs are more capable at most tasks than most random people off the street. I think at this point people keep asking about because they're trying to ask some deeper philosophical question like "when will it be human" but don't want to say that because it sounds silly.
You either have to turn people away or let them figure out how to live but the one foot in/one foot out situation where everyone is welcome but no one is actually allowed to do anything quickly turns your town into something that looks more like a rural Indian village.