1,323 karma · joined April 4, 2007
Bostonian by birth, Melburnian by conviction, Chilango for a lack of other options.
maw at pobox.com
I don't in general have trouble distinguishing colored areas when they're adjacent to each other. But when they're separated from each other -- as is often the case with a map and its legend -- it becomes a lot more difficult.
Using colors to show extent and numbers to match up with the legend is a great solution to this problem. Take note!
I was only about four fifths joking.
It's easier said than done, of course, but crash-only software is a worthwhile goal IMO.
Of course, if you asked me, it always was. You couldn't assume great connectivity then and you often still can't today.
I don't know if this is a good suggestion or not but I wonder if some form of "keepalive commit" might help here. I can imagine a few ways they might work, some simple, some more elaborate.
The only thing I'll add is that, ca 2012 which is when whatsapp started really taking off where I live, intercarrier SMS was slow and unreliable. WhatsApp was fast and reliable.
Good editing is makes all element of a lists is has the same grammatical form.
But they would last forever and they would actually work reliably. I'd buy a pair, happily.
I still remember hearing a Mexican friend whose English was, at the time, very basic use the word "polemical" and I could hardly believe it. I'm not sure most English speakers could use it correctly; I'm all but certain that I at the time couldn't.
They probably could have paid extra money out of pocket to call normally and get a substandard experience.
Another term is "comprehensible input" -- but I am not certain precisely how the two relate to each other. But hopefully they're enough for you to go on.
For the same reason, I asciibetically sorted things when it made sense.
Now I use prettier and black and I'm mostly satisfied by them, but their reflow behavior puts the lie to "[black] makes code review faster by producing the smallest diffs possible."
I think this is realistic, in spite of the opposition we can expect from both Big Ag and Big Fake Yoga.
Mostly offtopic: I initially misread that as "Professor of Think Tank" and I immediately understood it to mean something within the disciplines of military affairs, macroeconomics, some areas of law, a few others. This actually seems like an interestingly useful grouping, possibly more so than "STEM."
But here's an interesting sequence of events:
- The alt-right emerges as an influential bloc
- Our self-appointed explainers and meaning-makers try and fail to understand it; unable to understand it they're completely unable to explain it
- The term "alt-right" is bandied about more or less carelessly, often as an insult or as a way to discount ideological opponents, until:
- The term "alt-right" loses much of its meaning and is applied to people with only the most tenuous links to the original group.
The same basic thing has happened before and since: think of the neocons and the dirtbag left for example.
So, yes, they probably are trying to paint him as alt-right, but not at a level much above "lololol Bro Rogan sux !!!!!!!!". Reassured?
To somebody with APD, it sounds like science fiction, although it does require more suspension of disbelief than faster than light travel or teleportation.
(You can think what you want about Amazon, but it's a remarkably provincial piece.)