I agree with your broader point, of course; certainly making them optional hasn't helped matters.
1,323 karma · joined April 4, 2007
Bostonian by birth, Melburnian by conviction, Chilango for a lack of other options.
maw at pobox.com
I agree with your broader point, of course; certainly making them optional hasn't helped matters.
Good luck.
Not necessarily so strange. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootleggers_and_Baptists for instance.
Once other people can be expected to have done work based on your amended or rebased work, you can expect some annoyances (or worse). If you haven't pushed yet (or if you're really, really sure nobody's basing further work on something you've recently pushed), I say go crazy and amend and rebase to your heart's content.
Any clues on what to google for? I've tried the Great Suspender and wasn't very impressed.
Kristen Hare is unlikely to win this year's prize.
Did its maintainers not see fit to document it? Do they pooh-pooh you when you report the issue?
If so, I'm sure I'm not alone in never wanting anything to do with it.
Rather, it made me feel like an old fart using a computer for the first time, bewildered more often than not, most of my instincts rendered useless.
There are many examples in Asana of this. Each, taken alone, is banal: kind of annoying, but maybe not too bad. Taken together, though, we have something that a nicer person than I wouldn't wish on his worst enemy, but I'm just not that nice of a person.
That's been my nearly twenty year experience with emacs.
I don't disagree, but how do we get there from here? Our "betters" have even had the gall to make this type of change in the recent past, and even to claim "energy efficiency" as a motivation. This is is--how do I put this?--a wronger than wrong version of not even wrong.