616 karma · joined December 19, 2017
https://aider.chat/docs/usage.html (not a vscode plugin, but with other advantages even when using this editor)
https://docs.continue.dev/getting-started/overview
https://github.com/cline/cline
was pretty good too, but it had taken on too much in its latest version 2.0.0. In other words, it is too unstable at the moment (but probably worth looking at again later).
Almost at the same time as the emergence of transformers, I had only minimal contact with the field. I was just aware of the appearance of the Vaswani paper, but only now have I returned to the subject in a way that requires more rigour. And I stumbled upon "attention" in the same way as the author. It did not help to know more about the biological model [1].
Yes, kernels. Asking myself, what software implementations of the superior colliculus or yet retina cell complexes like DS (direction-sensitive) or OMS (object-motion-sensitive) cells could provide.
[1] for example: https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262019163/the-new-visual-neuros...
I'm only a mathematician, no physicist. But I think to remember, that the concept of a continuous physical space becomes quite muddled at this scale.
2. https://github.com/asciidoc-py/asciidoc-py
1 and 2 seem to hate 3 (see issue trackers / web sites of all three) and meanwhile probably also vice versa. The discussion was quickly dragged into the legal realm by 1 in particular, which very obviously dampened number 3's initial enthusiasm. Additionally, 2 describes itself somewhat prominently as a "legacy processor" for Python (technically correct in the current version, but legacy's meaning here is the relationship to the new Asciidoctor-specific constructs). At the same time it promises further development but nothing usable has come out of it so far.
As a Python programmer, I would simply like to see a pure Python3 toolchain. It is quite an absurd situation at this moment. For example, my blog is supporting Markdown and ReST natively (Pelican-based). For Asciidoc - my preferred language - Pelican has a plugin, supporting different Asciidoc processors, but only at the first glance. It has also to support KaTeX. This on the other hand is no problem for Pelican's native Markdown languages (simply another plugin), but the Asciidoc plugin is too high-level. It can only use Asciidoctor in this case, requiring Ruby's KaTeX gem as an extra dependency. This gem seems to be abandoned and has compatibility issues with newer Asciidoctor versions ...
2 is no option for its installation hell alone (Asciidoc3 is pure Python, simply a pip install). I don't know, if it is able to interact with KaTeX.
From what I can see, 3 would technically offer the best initial platform for further development as a package. Could be wrong, of course.
In the grand scheme of things, I really appreciate this setup. All my domains can contain an infinite number of derived addresses, which makes it possible to control outgoing information. For example, it's easy to detect and eliminate multiple types of spam sources.
Can you really get a PhD in anything even remotely STEM-related these days without at least knowing what those things are? I'm growing old...
Oh no, mathematics is many things. For me - a mathematician - it started with Galois' proof about the nonsolvability of polynomial equations with degree >= 5. No physics is required for this way of thinking about symmetries. Same with number theory, primes and indefinitely more things. Many gained applications to physical problems later, many not. The latter is not a sign that something is missing.
Jürgen Trittin (2004): Eine Kugel Eis... (costs for "Energiewende" )
There is the infamous saying, "Fusion is always twenty years ahead." But renewables seem to be trying hard to live up to that saying (AND getting more expensive along the way)
https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/13020/umfrage...
Would you rather rely on your phone that hasn't been charged for two days?
Actually, the situation is not even a trade-off. There is no dichotomy. When you use both, you simply gain a convenient extra layer of redundancy.
AFAIK this is virtually impossible if done as required by keto (the carbohydrate limit is quite tight, it is violated very quickly without objective bookkeeping) and you also control protein intake. The liver's glycogen store lasts about a day, after which you need to burn fat (maybe some muscle glycogen).
I still think most people should not follow the diet without breaks, deficiencies simply exist in this one as well. I like my apple and also could not stand the sight of broccoli and cauliflower for a long time after finishing it.
I'm living now according to some kind of relaxed low carb method, combined with occasional interval fasting (also allowing ketosis).
https://betterprogramming.pub/numpy-illustrated-the-visual-g...
Perhaps not close enough.
- look up "infrasound" and "undercutting minimum distances", better use something else than Google for this.
- also check the requirements for the base materials: concrete, aluminium, fiber-reinforced plastic. Calculate the energy requirements for producing them.
- familiarize yourself with the space requirements (~ two acres of highly compacted soil, not including access roads)
- duration and disposal
- soil dehydration, other environment impact issues
- ... and as always of course, base load capability and storability
It depends, there is no simple entity "independent contractor". If you can run your business as Freiberufler - roughly but not quite a freelancer - you may have found a pretty lightweight framework - even compared to other jurisdictions. Simpler accounting, no need for balance sheets and therefore for a tax advisor in most cases (still recommended). Liability can be largely limited by insurance, depending on the field of business.
I'm doing this for over 20 years and I simply have no need to own any kind of corporation.
Of course, YMMV.
I would not consider the attribute "rare" to be appropriate here.
For example: I regularly deal with adversarial networks, and both black- and white-box attacks are quite common there.
Not a native speaker (never heard "clear box" as terminus technicus), but a mathematician: If it is "the (only) opposite", the relation ist symmetric. So the opposite of "clear box" is "black box" again. Skipping the injective part, "black box" would be still one possible opposite.