8,294 karma · joined March 2, 2012
Advertising directed towards AI models, at the very least. If you can get into ChatGPT's weights that McDonalds is the cheapest and tastiest hamburger, how many millions of people would ChatGPT tell that to?
Because if they can barely succeed that way against an enemy 1/3 of their size, they wouldn't be able to succeed that way against an enemy larger than them. And that's not even accounting for the fact that, after fighting a war of attrition, those people, those resources are dead and gone. Even if Russia wins, they don't have the manpower to do this again.
Because in the Russian occupied territories, Russia has no interest in reporting the number of civilian deaths.
How to use LLMs? There’s no “how to use LLMs”, you just tell them what you want, and they give it to you. Or they give you sometimes, and sometimes they give you something else. Or they’re telling you they’re giving you exactly what you want, but don’t. Or they seem like they’re giving you what you want, only it’s got a secret mistake somewhere inside, that you need to dig through and search for. Maybe there’s no mistake after all.
Yes, this is clearly a new wonder-technology, and all criticisms of it are just old people, back on their cloud-yelling bullshit.
On the other hand, people (generally) get sent to prison for committing a crime, not for being incredibly smart or talented.
You really don’t understand people at all.
I left it off because "she resigned" is definitely not the same thing as "I was fired".
I'm not sure "my coworkers don't respect me" is the same thing as "I got fired".
And beyond that: people’s assets are mostly residential real estate, not commercial real estate. So I don’t know that people will get that worked up about commercial real estate devaluing.
That's... pretty much every student with any long, tubular object. Of which there are many.
If they want to change the immigration laws, they first need to convince people that immigrants currently in the country illegally aren't monsters.
The only rational way of doing things is to turn every part of our economy into a bubble? Well, that at least explains why it’s all collapsing.
No, but you can raise the rents. Best case scenario, they pay the higher price. Worse case scenario they leave—which leaves you exactly where you were before, with some extra money in your pocket.
Well, the government at the very least. From the article:
> Banks are highly regulated, so they can’t just loan whatever they want. The government insists that banks keep high margins of safety in their portfolio, and commercial loans are risky, so the terms they can offer are designed to limit risk. […] Second, the bank must keep a strict loan-to-value (LTV) ratio — so they won’t lend more than 80% of the value of the building (and often less than that).
The government says banks can’t loan more than 80% of the value of the building because it’s too risky. But what banks have done is instead maintained an inflated value of the property so they can loan out a higher percentage, which has led to the country being full of empty, overvalued property. Ie, a high risk of collapse—which is just what the regulation was intending to prevent. Lying about the value of an object to get around regulations is often considered fraud.
Trump has things that he says—many things that he says. How many of them are beliefs, and how many of them are his normal verbal diarrhea, and how many of them are just the words of the last person who spoke to him?
That’s hard to claim to make right after a Trump victory—trashing their opponents has been the Republicans playbook my entire life, and it’s currently working quite well for them.
It would still sound more human coming from you.
This has causality backwards—being a group requires an identity element. You can't show something is a group without knowing that the identity element exists in the first place.
In fact, a good chunk of how this article talks about the math is just... slightly off.
That’s… not really true.