Isn't it weird that the people that don't create value are also the people with all the money, though?
8,284 karma · joined March 2, 2012
Isn't it weird that the people that don't create value are also the people with all the money, though?
Farmers—as in, the land-owning famers—are generally wealthy people.
What you're describing is called "Trickle Down Economics", and has led to 50 years of economic failure.
Politics is how we interact with each other as a group, how we make decisions as a society and put those decisions into effect. That seems like one of the least stupid things I can think of.
> wasn't like that before my time
As the great William Martin Joel once said, "We didn't start the fire. It was always burning, since the world's been turning."
"acceptable to have differing political opinions" is not the same thing as "all political opinions were acceptable". The former was true, and still is. The later never was true, and never will be. But supporters of deeply unpopular opinions always try to pretend those two things are the same.
On the other hand, I can’t tell what St. Petersburg is supposed to be. Is that the Dali Museum?
That's how German culture as it is was created in the first place. And that's how the future German culture will be created, ad infinitum.
How miserable that sounds. And how limiting.
If you live near a Costco, you can. The one near me is opening in a week, and I can't wait.
I agree, this isn't the cheapest way to develop. I just don't think I'd call it "fraud".
I have trouble imagining you misread the comment you were replying to, that badly, accidentally.
Why is that fraud? That seems more like congresspeople having something to offer each other, to build up relationships and interdependence. What we have now is that our 2 parties don’t care about each other and don’t need each other, so there’s no reason for them to work together.
Sadly, like most things, Buying Games and Playing Games are 2 different hobbies.
Is that the case? Or do they want short games, so they can complete it and move on to the next game. If you’re buying games regularly, either they’re shorter games, or you’re not completing them all—in which case, the length doesn’t really matter. Or looking at it the other way, if you like long games, and you’re completing them, you’re not buying games regularly.
More interesting than each other?
They suggest a pair of Mac Studios w/ M5 Ultra chips and 512 GB of RAM. A single Mac Studio w/ M5 Ultra and half that RAM (256 GB) is around $11k, and the 512 GB option isn't even available yet. So.... yeah.
I don't think it's the technology OR the people that the author doesn't like—I think it's what the people produce with that technology. Namely, the slop and bots currently overwhelming the internet.
I agree, but I think pretty much everything will get noticeably worse in the years to come. It has happened to a lot of civilizations: they had some high level of skill in beautiful pottery, and then over the generations that skill disappeared. Probably because they were cheaper.
Nobody did it, and it’s bad.
Having looked at some of them (and it being one of my favorite books) ... it won't do that. These visualizations are as terrible as they are unnecessary.