66 karma · joined February 19, 2018
Presuming the translation was correct I would "agree to comply with Chinese laws ... [and] grant the company a non-exclusive, free, perpetual license for global use (including modification, display, and derivative development)."
I find it more readable and portable.
[1] https://www.docker.com/blog/introduction-to-heredocs-in-dock...
Useful discussion is an interesting scope for someone with the broad, in-depth knowledge of a vast array of subjects he demonstrates in the linked essay.
Presenting it as a Cloud SQL problem is disingenuous.
Do you have a link that would clarify?
Your idea combines what feels like a significant percentage of randomness while still having enough participation to rationalize buy-in.
It's tough to want to yield control of an important choice to a random number generator... though that's not an inaccurate description for this.
I like this as a perspective on "the illusion of choice". Part of me hates the phrase because I want to believe that I can take meaningful action.
Everything else remains pretty much the same...
That's not how I expect your choice of mic to affect anyone else's experience.
It would surprise me if additional network load is part of what happens.
alias scp='rsync'
You may be better off not playing with the creepy neighbor.
I've been using git for years, and can't find documentation for start.
https://gitexercises.fracz.com/exercise/master https://git-scm.com/docs
Did you wind up picking something else?
> I no longer contribute to upstream directly, due to upstream's failure to recognize me as a major contributor and uphold my copyright accordingly.