555 karma · joined April 5, 2011
I grew up in the punk/hardcore scene in the D.C. area many years ago and this statement definitely held true. One thing I noticed was that most of the kids I used to hang out with ended up being fairly high-achieving adults. Most everyone has their undergrad degree and many of them actually work in software engineering. Now when we talk, we talk about Linux, Python and C++ in addition to recalling old shows at 9:30 Club, Wust, and the Safari Club.
I don't know enough about particle physics to know whether you and him/her are even remotely close to saying the same thing.
I'm in your situation btw. I worked through undergrad and grad school and had my work pay for almost all of my school so I never had any debt. But I realize I was lucky and had a good situation lined up and not everyone has the same opportunities. Some people need more assistance than others, and I don't mind if the govt helps those folks out.
If the quality of these coarse-grid forecasts is degraded it's going to have an effect on all downstream processing/forecasts.
If the agency provides a vital service to the country, I'd say it is bad to punish the country by cutting their funding just because an employee in that agency leaked a document.
Mr. Trump is a pathetic excuse for a president.
I don't even want to see what happens when you mark a region and call M-x align in a variable width font.
Exactly, and this is the sort of thing that can be done with open source software. It may not even be a lot of code depending on how it is approached.
idx = np.random.choice(range(n_features), size=self.max_features, replace=False)
It would appear that the replace=False prevents the 'sampling with replacement' behavior usually implemented by bagging algorithms. Should the replace=False be changed to replace=True?e: fixed typo