Peter and Sam are a masterclass in deception (or incompetence).
32 karma · joined February 21, 2026
Peter and Sam are a masterclass in deception (or incompetence).
Sentence could have ended there
In that light Altman saying things things like that is not really surprising. Contrary it only reinforces their desperation to me.
I built late to fix this. It’s a single-binary Go/BubbleTea TUI built around a subagent orchestrator pattern. The main prompt is strictly ~100 lines. The orchestrator routes tasks to transient subagents with isolated context windows, explicitly preventing the "Debugging Decay" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18403) and context pollution seen in monolithic agents.
Architectural notes:
* Linux Native: Strictly respects XDG base directories. No Windows support. No padded Electron GUI.
* Execution Load: The rapid context switching breaks the mainline llama.cpp scheduler. You must compile the specific PR linked in the README (or just point it at any standard API via localhost:8080).
* Licensing: BSL 1.1 to keep the core orchestrator logic out of VC-backed wrappers.
I also open-sourced pure-go-sgd (AGPLv3) today for those interested in bare-metal Go infrastructure: https://github.com/mlhher/pure-go-sgd
Among many more of them with similar results. This one gives a 39% drop in performance.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18403
This one gives 60-80% after multiple turns.
If an agent is curling untrusted data while holding access to sensitive data or already has sensitive data loaded into its context window, arbitrary code execution isn't a theoretical risk; it's an inevitability.
As recent research on context pollution has shown, stuffing the context window with monolithic system prompts and tool schemas actively degrades the model's baseline reasoning capabilities, making it exponentially more vulnerable to these exact exploits.