It's quite likely that SJ would suffer from severe reputational damage from being the literal voice of AI.
13,233 karma · joined October 12, 2007
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mbuckbee
email: mike@expeditedsecurity.com
It's quite likely that SJ would suffer from severe reputational damage from being the literal voice of AI.
It was much more rigorous than the author's approach, with weekly doctor visits and taking increasingly large amounts of whatever they were allergic to (starting with micrograms of nut powder).
I think my niece had the best time as she eventually was advised to start eating daily measured amounts of nutella.
I mention this mostly because I do think the author was a bit cavalier in his approach (mostly because it's hard to accurately judge dosage from wild plants) but also to just spread the word that the allergy desensitization therapies are out there and quite effective and life changing.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Carpentry/comments/13j7o4u/staggere...
What's different this time around is that it's much more _answers_ focused than _search_ focused, and it's not a smaller competitor coming in to try and play the same game, but a whole new thing.
PG invested in Phind explicitly with the notion that "our kids aren't going to know what a search results page is" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1rHPFiY6FA
AI services like ChatGPT are already cannibalizing search in certain areas (programming questions, knowledge questions, "what's the difference between" questions, etc) as they give objectively better answers without all the weird SEO and advertising cruft.
It's a wildly better experience searching for "traditional apple pie recipe" on ChatGPT than on Google due to the brutal amount of intrusive ads and over-optimization and the gap is just getting bigger.
Google can't meaningfully improve their search without killing their profits and growth numbers.
On the other side, we haven't even seen the real google killers arrive which are going to be in the form of better AI assistants (Siri, Alexa and Cortana that actually work).
Right now, they have all of those items natively integrated into their online editor, making it stupidly easy for even someone as graphically challenged as me to get decent output.
Ham radio's time has come and gone, but I still treasure the memories of listening to him talk to people all over the world.
MFJ shutting down is likely one of the final nails in the coffin, but I'll be sad to see it go.
AI-generated content has really dropped the floor on how cheap it is to produce niche blogspam, and they're saying: "Hey if you're pushing out 1000s of articles a day on a topic and we look at it and it's insane gibberish, we're just going to assume it's no good on principle and ban you."
Nobody is getting banned for the "Gray-AI" of assisted writing, where you get help with an outline or use Grammarly Pro to rewrite your sentences into coherence.
Reading books, watching videos, social, etc. but also interacting with webforms, etc. are all easier on a larger device and screen.
In general, Tor exit nodes are quite well known and blocked to a greater degree than VPNs.
My heavily used ones are: Markdown to HTML (copy), which lets you write and preview markdown and then copy+paste it as html into things like newsletters, CMS, etc. as a single step.
The other one is Markdown to PDF, which lets you organize a series of markdown files into a coherent structure and then spits out an ebook on command.
1. You're 100% right, there are privacy concerns.
2. I don't know if they could possibly be worse than the majority of school districts (including my kids) running directly off of Google's Education system (Chromebooks, Google Docs, Gmail etc.).
- Open source
- Text files all the way down
- Easily understood DSL
- Easily distributed
- Easily versioned
- Fast
Download the executable, copy the two lines below into "first-test.hurl" and you're up and running.
GET http://localhost:3000
HTTP 200
I realize I'm fanboying a bit here, but Hurl really has been so helpful for our particular use case at wafris.org where we're trying to support a large number of different HTTP clients. We can just give an integration partner access to our hurl suite and they're good.So this number isn't "wrong" so much as specialized.
Bing has been an also-ran in the search world for a decade (single digit % of search volume compared to Google's 90%+), and AI has shown the first real crack in Google's monopoly.
The future is pretty clearly going to be directly getting AI answers to questions and much less looking at a page of 10 blue links and it's still really unclear if Google is going to make the transition.
Some of it's in asking ChatGPT: "Give me the 3 possible ways to implement X?" and getting something back I hadn't considered. A lot of it is in sort of "super code completion".
I use Cursor and the UI is very slick. If I'm stuck on something (like a method that's not working) I can highlight it and hit Cmd+L and it will explain the code and then suggest how to fix it.
Hit Cmd+K and it will write out the code for you. Also, gotten a lot of mileage out of writing out a rough version of something in a language I know and then getting the AI to turn that into something else (ex: Ruby to Lua).
It may be caching or it didn't change the model being queried or something else.