I hope you learn something from it.
I'd love to know what you think about this question, where my reasoning doesn't make sense, and any other feedback you might have.
94 karma · joined July 14, 2017
I hope you learn something from it.
I'd love to know what you think about this question, where my reasoning doesn't make sense, and any other feedback you might have.
Spending an order of magnitude more time on each post seems ridiculous to me.
The point of most on/off page SEO things like meta tags and link building is to help Google understand what needs your website can satisfy.
If your content solves problems effectively, and Google understands how to connect you to the people who have those problems, that's when things work.
These days the most consistent way to get lots of traffic is to provide lots of value and help people.
Google can measure whether people bounce and keep clicking around for better answers to their queries.
The goal is to answer the question or problem as best as you can.
Typically this means not just giving a one line answer, but expanding and elaborating, going into relevant details and explaining more in-depth.
Often this extra detail will overlap with extra detail from other questions. You can link between articles, but you can also rephrase / repeat ideas.
eg. If you're searching for "Redirect in javascript" or "Simulate link in Javascript", you'll want two separate articles.
You know that the answer is the same for both, but the searcher doesn't. And as you go more in-depth explaining how `window.location` works, you'll end up covering similar material in both articles (which is not duplicate content so Google won't penalize you).
It's similar to the effect that changing focal length on a camera has. eg. Wider angle lenses seem to squish far away objects and enlarge closer objects. However, this affects the entire image in a consistent way whereas changing focal length does not.
I wonder if this could be used to simulate focal length changes?
That's all I was getting at in my poorly constructed reply.
This is clearly false.
Additionally, if you can't pay your mortgage because the recession hits you as well, then you can lose the house.
There is no bullet-proof strategy.
Almost all bad decisions result from not taking a long enough perspective.
The recession will end at some point, so how can you use the recession to improve your situation?
The economy will recover, and you'll have bought a lot of value for a good discount.
Like you say, timing the market is a bad idea, and that is what you are doing if you try to move to "safer" assets when you "think" the market will go bad.
If you keep your assets in riskier stocks (which have higher long-term returns) for more than a decade, you may take a huge hit during a recession, but you'll come out the other end way ahead than if you try to time the market.
I especially like the idea of not just looking for competitors, but trying to figure out why they are successful, and making sure that they don't have some advantage that you can't replicate.
I have had Feyman's lectures sitting on my bookshelf for well over a year now, and hope it won't always be in my "someday" bucket.
If you spend 100 hours setting up a website, and over the next 5 years you never touch it and you make some money, some would consider that "passive". But really, you put in 100 hours, and made $x from it.
I think people are really looking for high ratio of money to time spent, not something that is truly "passive".
I'm looking to implement a GTD-like system myself, and any automation is helpful.
Are you sure that you need to be working more hours? Based on the setup you have, it simply sounds like you need to be accomplishing more. The actual number of hours it takes to complete a ticket is irrelevant (if I understand correctly).
itamarst had some good things to say about increasing productivity.
Specifically his latest book: http://yourturn.link
You have the attention and trust of a LOT of people. Figure out what they need, what problems they have.
It looks like the example data isn't correctly set up.
Even if it's terrible (and it likely will, since you are still learning), you will have learned all those skills that you say you need.
You need to develop your skills in building applications, and the only way to do it is by building applications.
You also need proof of your newly acquired skills, and actual code is the best way to do it (even if you have great credentials).
Actually, don't build an application. Build several.
Podcasts or YouTube videos are usually about an hour long, and the songs are mixed so they flow continuously from one to the next.
I find the constant beat, and somewhat repetitive melodies and rhythms help to get me into a state of flow.
It sounds like it's a mental health issue, not an issue with your skills or the marketplace. You just need to heal your mind, and nature and a good vacation or break can do that.
I got a camera recently and have been debating whether or not to get Adobe's photographer package. Currently I just use Lightroom mobile.
Now I'm thinking I'll probably go with this. It looks really good!