Even if you are Meta. The only trick we use is something anyone can do - hotfix it in Hyperscale, or download the Stream fix as soon as a signed build is available without waiting for it to be fully released
218 karma · joined July 27, 2014
Even if you are Meta. The only trick we use is something anyone can do - hotfix it in Hyperscale, or download the Stream fix as soon as a signed build is available without waiting for it to be fully released
Indeed.
> I don't think getting rid of frame pointer omission would be viable if Fedora still supported 32-bit x86
Fedora still supports it (e.g. packages are still built for i686, and you can install them on x86_64) though it has dropped 32-bit ARM. But the change to reenable frame pointers will not be applied to 32-bit x86 builds.
eg GrapheneOS currently only supports Pixel 2, 3 and 3a:
Note that Telegram secret chats are end to end encrypted (default chats are not) but you're still dealing with the Telegram server (not peer to peer)
Note that the really poor Facebook users can still be targeted for advertising by politicians to curry their votes.
Prior to third-party DNS servers being blocked a lot of tech-savvy people were using either Google's DNS or OpenDNS anyway since they tend to be more reliable than the local ISP's (even before they started filtering).
I'm no longer in Indonesia, but I could imagine the results people are posting here would be useful to folks back home so they can adjust their DNScrypt config.
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2016/10/11/poll-on-mac-10-12-is-...
"Our engineers were comfortable with Git and we preferred to stay with a familiar tool, so we took a long, hard look at improving it to work at scale. After much deliberation, we concluded that Git's internals would be difficult to work with for an ambitious scaling project."
https://code.facebook.com/posts/218678814984400/scaling-merc...
So while I agree that people should be free to trade privacy for other things like getting a free service, I do wish there are stronger regulations to protect people who choose to opt out. And better transparency on how your data is being used.
I personally would be watching this and probably try and buy a couple of shares - Spotify is a streaming music pioneer and I shudder at the thought of yet another industry segment being dominated by the GAFA players (in this case, everyone but Facebook -- Google, Apple, Amazon).
IIRC the person that advocated for Chromium (instead of a third-party Firefox rebuild) base it on performance (they were dubious Quantum is actually better, I personally find it fast enough except when loading Facebook), as well as the alternative versions of Firefox not keeping up with the official version. Also, supposedly Chromium (as opposed to Chrome) settings are reasonably privacy-friendly out of the box.
They did recommend installing uBO-Extra in addition to uBlock Origin on top of Chromium, which is revealing -- with Firefox, there is not even a need for uBO-Extra.
My original point (which I didn't elucidate clearly enough) is that this Looking Glass experiment is resulting in unwarranted backlash against Mozilla -- whereas from the standpoint of preserving an open web and protecting user privacy it's actually one of the better players.
Still getting random freezes sleeping and waking though. Especially if I don't open the internal panel before disconnecting the external monitors and USB hub before putting the laptop to sleep.
i.e. can we run Linux on these?
Tidbit: "Pancasila" actually means "Five principles" so "The Five Pancasilas" sounds to me like Hugh Grant pointing out "The La Trattoria" in Mickey Blue Eyes.
I've just splurged on some hardware this year though, but keeping an eye for this and hope that with Google's Pixel strategy they're now serious about hardware (yearly refresh etc.).
I like Bash but writing anything remotely complex in it is... not recommended