Without architecture diversity, he wants to limit innovation, and promote a monopoly. x86 is anything but an open source standard, due to patents, and thus cannot be easily standardized. So he also voices against open standards.
635 karma · joined January 12, 2013
migamake.com
miga.at.hn
Without architecture diversity, he wants to limit innovation, and promote a monopoly. x86 is anything but an open source standard, due to patents, and thus cannot be easily standardized. So he also voices against open standards.
While money is wasted on proceedings.
Good case for a libel countersuit?
Linux moves towards massive process sharing, and thus various of sharing controls are key to the future that is missing from 90s operating systems.
Just enable sound, run your browser and music app, and count number of processes living with `ps ef|wc -l`. I see 282 kernel threads, and 536 total processes. You will see that we live in the future, because of extensive modularization of system services, and cannot get back without sacrificing reliability and comfort.
1. We could gradually port Linux `ioctl` to Plan9 namespaces, if there was understanding they greatly simplify Docker.
2. Docker and virtualization are one of most important applications of Linux, but there is still not even a proof-of-concept implementation of such on Plan9.
3. We don't need a complete rebuilding of Linux to make it more like Plan9. Both Windows and Mac OS X is an example of system that underwent radical redesigns of several subsystems.
4. All features of Plan9 could be brought to Linux by adding modules for alternative system interfaces, and deprecating old ones or blocking them with security capabilities.
Any information that can be subpoenae-ed can also be hacked away.
All tech companies invest.
Nobody is surprised when fresh technology (EV) requires upfront investment.
Title is misleading.
The thing is, that for big deployments you can be never so sure.
There may always be "human factor" that will cause users to click the wrong button without looking at its label.
1. Security vulnerabilities from unaudited code.
2. Copyright violation risk, since a lot of CoPilot examples show clear excerpts from open source repositories.
This purchase is just a proof that privacy protections given by US law are totally ineffective.
As soon as the data is on the open market, no GDPR, and no US law protects the customer, since public prosecution is not interested in blatant violation of privacy here.
This is also the main reason why EU continuously threatens US with withdrawing _safe harbor_ provisions.
As soon as the data enters US, the open market assures it will be widely available contrary to all regulations.
Since Stripe wants employees to cherish their vested interest in the company, the corporation goes ahead of law here and facilitates. This also means that employees are less likely to either forfeit and sell the stock to third parties.
Legislators promoting entrepreneurship may in future encourage this behaviour to strengthen employee ownership of companies, when RSUs become commonplace for most employees, not just executive officers.
Sure you may publish a JS library on NPM to prove it is sooo simple?
Good for viewing at 8k after you correct aspect ratio by browser window resizing.
However, only advertising "usable size" is truthful, everything else is misleading.
It is sad that the legal system tolerates such cheating because it makes it harder to find the actual properties of the product. Or even makes it impossible to actually know how the product will actually work.
They spent more time on this game than on any other.
Discord Snap has to block many unusual activities, but I still see these:
* attempt to `ptrace` processes all the time;
* using 99% CPU;
* to work Discord needs some non-standard interfaces to be connected;
* Discord tries to track which other programs you run by default and shares it.
* too frequently restarting desktop integration snap until the logs make machine non-functional (got 500GB.)
* blocking other programs using desktop integration for file dialogs: latency of several minutes, sometimes dialogs never appear.
Discord is as dodgy app as can be. Hope we will not find it is actually another distribution of spyware.
Since programs with so many bugs and crashes are frequently prone to security issues, I recommend to replace Discord with another app that allows push-to-talk.
The main difference is that the brand is more visible on Allegro.