635 karma · joined January 12, 2013
migamake.com
miga.at.hn
For benchmarks you may just prepare Phoronix Test Suite module (https://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/) to facilitate replication on a variety of machines.
And 16GiB VRAM insufficient for games:
https://videocardz.com/newz/pcgh-demonstrates-why-8gb-gpus-a...
Also, 3nm M4 is going head-to-head with older Ryzen AI 365 in everything except for power efficiency: https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare/apple-m4-vs-amd-ryzen-...
When compared in multicore against Ryzen AI Pro laptops (high end), even Apple M5 are behind in the dust...
https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/compare_cpu-amd_ryzen_ai_max_p...
Despite awesome progress with its latest ARM processors, Apple was caught behind Ryzen, and is threatened by next generation of Zen processors.
Indeed it is so performance sensitive, that it has blocked my region. Would it not be better to get a static site generator from a standard Markdown posts, and thus assure it is both performant and accessible?
Now it reaches just 2k$ per kilogram.
Here author talks about taxing software that remains with the employee, as if it were "gift" or "taxable benefit" of employment, not an exercise of unalienable right to share software for testing.
Sounds more like tax office logic, instead of common sense.
Taxable benefit would occur if Microsoft bought software of others and gifted it to employee. Or if Microsoft could not reasonably expect people to actually test the software, or allowed them to resell it.
It seems like this article does not distinguish non-monetary "benefit" from employment from necessity that the company gives free license to use its software for testing.
ACM is among the few publishers in technology that still resist open access, and told to pay for it.
It is unfortunate sign that organization struggles to fulfill its mission in promotion of computing research, and is instead leaning on interests that are outside its mission statement.
While Mr Perry prefers to parry words before a material blow lands, Mr Cook naturally avoids cooking an antitrust case.
Termination of developer account in this case merits FTC action.
There are 46 state members of Council of Europe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_states_of_the_Council_o...
In principle human rights are considered civilizational legacy, and the opinions are highly considered by other courts. However, the public policy of particular states is often at odds with these opinions.
It is great to have opinions, but it is even better to rigorously check them against reality.
What about performance?
They may analyze statistics behind answers, which is often costly.
But they may find it hard to prove that the bias is due to negligence.
If judge has all reasons to believe in fairness of the algorithm, then counter-accusation is the only way through.
How do they compare to human driving hours per fatality?
If only because they should be able estimate risk of and prevent criminal activity on home soil.
Since open source has been a successful business model in software, we might see another closed vs open battle in AI: Facebook and Google publish their models open source now.