233 karma · joined August 22, 2012
- How did you achieve the grainy cable TV style texture on your videos ?
- Are the videos curated ? Sometimes I waste a lot of time looking for quality content, or sometimes its good quality but you just don't vibe with the presenter or their style - so you continue to click around.
May be coming up with a list for people like us in itself could be something.
In fact, one could wager that the situation you described is directly a consequence of not adhering to what OP is suggesting.
https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/europe-imports-m...
https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news/2349110-australia-leads-n...
Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/masashi_wakui/ Twitter : https://twitter.com/masa_photo_jp
(1) Should a state decide to implement something like this, isn't this some sort of privacy violation by the state? People could have been prescribed these Anabolics by a physician too, don't they also come under the scanner?
(2) Also, I don't clearly understand the sampling here, tons of gallons get pumped into the wastewater system. How much quantity of samples would be collected for testing purposes? and what is the frequency of these samples being collected?
(3) Please totally excuse my ignorance here, the major banned substances for which athletes have been banned are "Methylhexaneamine", "Methenolone","Oxandrolone", and a lot of "Stanozolol" and "Turinabol" ( I m getting all this from this wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doping_at_the_Olympic_Games#Di...). The table in the paper doesn't seem to mention any of these substances. Are they mentioned under a different name?
(4) Also, in the light of new information (ie) state-sponsored doping, Lance Armstrong escaping some 500 Lab tests & going completing uncaught by WADA and so many other labs around the world, as a spectator I already know that a ton of Olympic athletes are doping. Isn't the actual problem trying to prove that "individual" athletes are doping? A collective evidence is probably not as useful anymore since all watchdogs, sports committees and spectators are more skeptical from the get go.
Could you explain the finance "coach" aspect of your app ? I have been in several situations where I wish one of these apps had told me a particular financial pro-tip & I have always felt let down. How would your app exactly be a coach ?
And are you using something like mail chimp to send out the emails ?
- Android phones are dominant in this market, since local manufacturers are able to sell cheap phones without incurring any software development cost.
- Telecommunication sector is heavily privatized in these markets & generally have multiple players offering low cost "pre-paid" services. Recharge stations and mobile stores are pretty ubiquitous - small mom & pop shops double up as resellers of these services , providing last mile coverage.
- On the contrary, Banking infrastructure is so heavily state run. And they don't have the same level of 'ease of access'. So, a lot of people working in the "unorganized sector"(Note: This is an official terminology that governments recognize and use) don't have formal accounts in financial institutions.
- Even if they did, a good number of banks run decade old tools and softwares. Making it all the more difficult to do mobile & online banking .
- And also, most of these economies are not cashless. Culturally and for other reasons,there is more trust on "Paper Cash".
- Finally , just because a person owns a cheap smart phone & ,one cannot assume banking literacy.