I thought that both started at 10.4 and then had all version updates up until 10.10.
134 karma · joined September 5, 2019
I thought that both started at 10.4 and then had all version updates up until 10.10.
> took two airs for almost a decade from 10.4 to 10.10 or something
I’m curious, did macOS 10.4->10.10 not constitute an OS update? Or was this a time when you applied your rule differently?
But you can't (easily) configure package X itself before you install it; and after you install it, it runs immediately so you only get to configure it after the first run.
[1] https://3blue1brown.com [2] https://github.com/ManimCommunity/manim
> Images were captured using a combination of confocal and two-photon microscopy, live imaging isolated mouse ovarian follicles.
Removing that blind spot is either Harder Than You'd Think or Easier Than You'd Think, depending on your perspective and expectations. You can find some issues listed here:
https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/
Or the homepage of reproducible-builds.org for a general take on the subject. (I am not associated with that website.)
But that is not what this message is about. It's confusingly worded, as many people agree, but what it says is that your local ref "main" points to the same commit as your local ref "origin/main." It says nothing about "main" on the other computer/server.
And it is not the case (i.e. you are not up to date with origin/main), for example, when you have committed to main but haven't pushed. It is also not the case when you have fetched but not merged.
A command name that I read as re-flog for the longest time :D. I really wondered about the strange, strange name for quite a while before I bothered to look up what it does and found out that I should read it as ref-log and that it is, indeed, a very useful thing.
When designing or evaluating security, one should not ignore that this is a part of reality.
So there must certainly be families in the English-speaking world where kids commonly say "dad's dad" and "mom's dad". Even when unlike in Scandinavian languages, it's not the canonical form.
For me, this translates directly to “close this very tab.“ “Now.“ And I’ll do that, but I’ll hit reply first ;-).
I wouldn't want to claim that one ideal set exists. But this one comes close. There is an often-cited XKCD comic that illustrates this: concatenating random lexicon words into a long, letter-only password (no special characters needed at all) is usually a very good password strategy.
Anything beyond that, in terms of better IT security, does not involve better passwords, but rather e.g. 2FA, Hardware tokens.
I have certainly heard it said that Linux as a desktop operating system is an utter mess or completely unusable.
> You ask a normie "what's your opinion of Windows 10?" and they'll have one, good or bad.
The "normies" I know do not have an opinion on Windows 10. Many do not even distinguish between Windows and Word. They have a computer, they know how to get some of their shit done with it. But they don't have a concept of "operating system", let alone an opinion on any one of them.
Some have an opinion on Android vs iPhone, but more often than not it's the quality of the camera they point to, rather than any feature of the operating system.
That said, I agree with your Interpretation of what "the year of Linux on the desktop" means and the fact that it hasn't happened.