952 karma · joined January 28, 2014
Optics & biotech startups, robots, cameras, 3d sensors, GPS, reverse engineering... current project will fly to Saturn.
[1] https://www.plasticstoday.com/packaging/arizona-beverages-sw...
Most user-facing connectors have a metal shield around them connected to frame ground. The idea is that any ESD shock goes safely through this first instead of to a sensitive data line.
Connection-sequencing ensures that the ground and power is connected before data lines are. If you look inside a cable-side USB connector, you'll see that the inner two wires (data) are recessed a little so that the power connectors go first. A device that is connected without power can (through its ESD protection circuit) attempt to draw power from data lines... this can cause damage because most data lines can't supply the current to power the entire device.
For genetic data, HapZipper beats general-purpose compression. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488212/
So, yes, actively researched, but you've got to pick a specific task that makes sense. Even small niches are viable; I made a task-specific compressor to strip the essential numbers out of a remote sensor report to make it small enough to squirt to a satellite.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JailbreakMe#JailbreakMe_1.0_(i...
There are two major complication to repair.
First, carbon fiber items are made in a mold. Repair doesn't have access to that mold, so you've got to build your own. You can get a good approximation from casting an adjacent part, or the opposite side - otherwise you have to improvise and sand it to match. Catastrophic failure, like when the bow is broken more than a few degrees, requires an alignment jig to keep the boat straight.
Second, carbon fiber works best when it's a laminate - e.g. a carbon/foam/carbon sandwich. So most designs are tubular or involve a stackup. This is tricky if the inside layer isn't accessible. Or a high-performance inner layer is used, like delicate honeycomb aluminum. Rebuilding something that was custom-made to tight tolerances is difficult.
I'd think that a degradable epoxy would be best for recycling applications; repair has a lot of other challenges.
Of course it can be abused if the only thing being delivered is a hard copy. I'm a bit surprised that the original source code wasn't delivered and the customer built it themselves. But assemblers often ran on mainframes, and that wasn't cheap.
From Sega v. Accolade - https://openjurist.org/977/f2d/1510
>We hold that when there is no other method of access to the computer that is known or readily available to rival cartridge manufacturers, the use of the initialization code by a rival does not violate the [Lanham Trademark] Act even though that use triggers a misleading trademark display.
I seem to remember a similar case for the Gameboy ROM that needed to contain an image of the Nintendo trademark to boot, but couldn't find a good online reference. Lexmark tried to pull a similar stunt by claiming the ROM code in their cartridge chips was executable code in a secret language, but courts again said it was an access control code first, and thus functional not creative.
Also, in this thread, I think you all know this, but wanted to make sure - a chemical oxygen generator "burns" to produce oxygen. The exothermic reaction is started with a small explosive; burning means its producing oxygen. Of course, in the 592 crash, they weren't properly packed with heat shielding, so catching other things on fire (plus the excess oxygen) was the cause of the crash. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_oxygen_generator
I'm not sure I want my plane to just shut down if it ingests something.
If you need more power, I'd suggest a module like this one: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ptn78000a.pdf Switched capacitors are great for low currents, but inductors work better for higher currents.
Because I can't see the datasheet of the audio amplifier, it may be wired in a way that it doesn't use significant current from this supply (for example, in the pre-amp part of the circuit). But then we wouldn't be getting the advantage of 17v supply to make it louder than other games.
When overloaded, simple switching power supplies like this lose their regulation. In this case, the switcher operates at 10kHZ, so it might introduce a high-pitched sound to the output.
You can probably get away with connecting the -5v input to GND to make the circuit run at 12v instead of 17v. Or, look for a more capable negative power supply.
[1] https://www.renesas.com/us/en/document/dst/icl7660-datasheet
So, intel made a custom processor for this that's really good at the correlations. The original one was the D4, and later they used their movidius chip. Both have lots of multiplier-accumulate silicon, so it can do the computations in parallel. Their architectures are also set up for convolution (which re-uses a lot of data) rather than random-processing (like a CPU does), so they could feed these math engines without a lot of data transfer -- this makes it more power efficient. You could do something similar in an FPGA, but dedicated silicon is going to be faster, cheaper, and use less power.