mpwouden

Humans tend to project our emotional states on animals and, in the case of AI, inanimate objects. While the first can be cute and innocuous, the second creates an incredible amount of risk in the advancement of AI and the well-being of humans.

AI computes, humans think. When humans think, they ask questions because they are curious. AI only works with what they have and asks for no more.

I think the bigger issue I have is that I think we risk treating them as if they were AGI and that almost then makes them so but with greater risk. It's also a bit of a shifting goal posts in some ways too.

How close are we to AGI and do people actually understand what that means? Too often people use the term as if General were 'ubiquitious' as in a broad application of AI instead of one that is inditinguishable from human intelligence.