mwkaufma

... because the AI promise is all hype?

It's just obviously trying to ride coattails with vibe-shit. If "blender" wasn't in the name it wouldn't be on the HN frontpage.

Feels like intentional brand-confusion with Blender.

"Copper is a programming language that I use as a replacement to C."

That's used... to make what?

(2012)?

A truly thoughtless "thought experiment."

The sus bit is that the PEP they requested greatly increased the scope of the feature.

>> For example, rather than proposing one single concrete JIT implementation, it may make more sense for the PEP to describe a JIT infrastructure that can support multiple implementation strategies.

The poison-pill requirements had their intended effect: https://discuss.python.org/t/an-announcement-from-the-steeri...

It would have been more honest to just cut the feature instead of haranguing a developer until they withdrew it.

Gotcha, thanks for the context.

(not to mention vilifying the Actual Touhou Developers and positing an incoherent east-vs-west honor system)

I'm all here for testimonials about the harms AI hype brings to niche communities, but the messenger's idiosyncracies here tell a different story than the headline.

Bellyaching about a benign-if-mildly-presumptuous BSD request by making a point to complain abou C++ Modules support, of all things, doesn't demonstrate a less-narrow perspective on the part of the maintainer.

Also, comparing AI skepticism to GamerGate really reveals a mind forever locked in decades-old grievances.

Everything's fine, don't look at CoreWeave's ticker, look at (picks random other healthy company) ASML instead.

No mention of AI at all in this repo.

No mention of AI at all in this repo.

Cope

s/politics/money

"I hired an artist but only credit them in a tiny footnote."

Warming up to LLMS... explicitly _after_ full branch-coverage and fuzzing.

Didn't expect their branding to lift from Tim Heidecker's Dootle Dots, but here we are.

(has played sim city thousands of times since 1993) "I got this."

No I don't. I believe landlords grab any excuse to price gouge. You're tilting at a strawman.

Edit 1: We agree rent is a problem, we disagree that your LVT "one weird trick" is effective, and I'm hostile to the trojan-horse-end-of-income-tax which gets this stuff on HN in the first place.

Edit 2: you'll win more hearts without the patronizing/smug rhetoric.

Freely choose to pass.

Evidence is presented suggesting landlords don't lower rent when costs go down, and a hand-wavy claim is made by-symmetry that they won't raise rents when costs go up. It's nonsense, there's nothing to rebut.

Buried in the middle, a whole section on "won't landlords just pass costs into tenants" passed over with the weakest deflections. This is willful naivety.

Magical thinking intensifies.

Bootlicking apologia for a bad boss.

Dems' are a center-right party.

Pretty milquetoast analysis which I'm sure ruffles the feathers of all the landlords in the peanut gallery on this site, but what's really objectionable is the periodic terrible AI-generated images.

Ctrl-F "marx" -- 0 results.

"Advisory Group"

   Importantly, the group will not be responsible for advising us on how to pace our internal progress on mathematics.