n42

    confirm-close-surface = false
    macos-titlebar-style = tabs
    theme = IR_Black

I've thought a lot about this – every time a new one is posted. I wish we could live in a world where this is what STEM education looks like. I think that, ultimately, it's just very high labor cost, and edtech is not known for being highly lucrative.

Bartosz does these as a labor of love, and the world is better off for it.

is this supposed to take the place as the officially blessed frontend language for SPIR-V? or is this just another standard attempting to replace the other standards (insert XKCD)?

  Slow Horses
  Lessons in Chemistry
  Severance
  Ted Lasso
  Shrinking
  Mythic Quest
  Roar
  CODA
  The Problem with John Stewart

  Palm Royale
  For All Mankind
  Criminal Record
  Killers of the Flower Moon
  Foundation
  Strange Planet
  The Morning Show
  Greyhound

  ping -a

Can someone expand on this? How do you run software that isn't code signed?

fwiw I agree with what you're getting at with your original response. maybe I'm arguing semantics.

the more I think about your point that this is just competitive behavior the more I question what the term anti-competive even means

I do think it's sort of unproductive/inflammatory in the OP, it isn't really nefarious not to want people to have easy access to your secret sauce.

I respect, maybe even envy, the clarity and humble conviction in your writing.

I learned a lot reading this.

I guess I should also add that it is just the rendering engine, not a full browser

[0] https://servo.org/blog/2020/11/17/servo-home/

[1] https://servo.org/blog/2023/01/16/servo-2023/

I would be interested in an article making a case against these drinks that used some kind of substantial argument, but this is not it. The article may as well be an anti vaccine article claiming vaccines give you diarrhea, our bodies regulate themselves, and big pharma is trying to get you hooked on a recurring revenue model to create a class divide. A pseudo-intellectual argument worked backward from trying to explain the “feeling” that putting chemicals in your body is bad.

Reading between the lines, I suspect the real root of the argument is that the author has an emotion - they don’t like the idea of Soylent or the brand that was created behind it - and is jumping through hoops to rationalize that feeling.

  window.addEventListener("change", function(e) {
      if (e.target instanceof HTMLInputElement && !e.target.checked) {
          e.target.click();
      }
  });

Clickbait does not mean bad. It does not mean I don't like it. It doesn't mean evil. It means it is bait designed to make you click.

And clearly, if you look around you, it's working.

I don't even care that it is clickbait. that's the game every YouTuber is playing. but, it is unashamed, by the book, clickbait.

crate authors that try to remove all unsafe often do it to relieve the burden of trust from the user.

_this_, in my opinion, is the power of the `unsafe` keyword (which probably should have been split into `trust_me` blocks and `check_yourself` functions). it constrains the conversations about memory safety into very tightly defined and auditable locations in the code, AND it creates new, manageable conversations about trust.