430 karma · joined January 30, 2011
The basic gist of Easterbrook's argument is that in everyday life it is common to buy now and find out the terms later, and under the law and the UCC the sequence of money and accepting terms don't matter.
While the case has been stretched to the limit, and lots of research shows that users aren't reading the terms of service, the practice and the law in the US has only strengthened.
After free and faster free shipping, the next best thing feels like predicting what you want and sending it to you.
Has anyone seen a site using an IP assignment agreement which is the equivalent of "take my work, I don't want credit, and it's just for your site"?
The Creative Commons CC0 license comes closest, but one could scrape those puzzles and create a competing site, which I'd guess Eric wants to avoid.
Similar to lawyers, it would be interesting if instead of relying on Wealthfront and AngelList, engineers at Google, Facebook, Apple, etc started openly contributing their salary information to increase wages to 2-3x that of engineers at less selective employers and create this bi-modal distribution in tech.
[1] http://www.lawfirmstats.com/firms/ [2] https://books.google.com/books?id=IY4ieeVyer4C&pg=PA18&lpg=P... [3] http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/1998/10/05/newsco...
ii) Airbnb your home, especially if you live in or near a big city. Or rent a home to Airbnb.
Additionally, a more realistic choice facing the landlord would be picking between a "good tenant" on paper paying the rent, and a "bad tenant" on paper willing to pay an extra $250/month.
But there is an another way - let us (all of us) get the Craigslist data for you. You could create a browser plugin that would save craigslist posts a user views, and then upload only those posts to a central database that feeds padmapper. With just 1,000 users you would get most but not all the data you currently are scraping.
This is the same approach used by Recap (https://www.recapthelaw.org/) as a response to the federal government's paywall to access public court filings.
Everything is a negotiated outcome, but good engineers are worth market salary in the absence of equity.
With equity, one rule of thumb I've heard is give 1% for every $10,000 cut the person takes. This implicitly values your company at $1m, but I guess most companies don't hire an employee unless the business is worth at least that.
Another rule of thumb I've heard is $50k for 2%-4%. Somewhat supporting this is Aaron Patzer (Mint.com founder) paid his early engineers $30k-$50k for 1% to 5% equity. See http://techcrunch.com/2009/10/08/startups-101-the-complete-m...
I think it depends on your time frame.
Short (1 month): use linkedin to find friends or friends of friends to network with. Emotional connections help because money alone isn't going to keep someone when things get rough.
Medium (2 months): you could try outsourcing and hiring a developer on Odesk/eLance etc. Map out your product milestones, and hire 3 developers to do the same thing to get to the first milestone. One will turn out great, one ok, and one will fail.
Long (3-6 months): attend a programming meetup in your city. Be warned though that these folks hate ppl that parachute in just looking to hire code monkeys who will work for bananas. They are there to code and learn from each other. You could try setting up an environment and coding, and slowly develop a relationship with someone by attending 3+ meetups.