I used his guides when developing for the PineTime and everything worked perfectly. I would have been completely lost without his information.
Thank you Lup!
420 karma · joined September 23, 2012
I used his guides when developing for the PineTime and everything worked perfectly. I would have been completely lost without his information.
Thank you Lup!
I also support the rights of private citizens living in a free society to act on their own behalf, however they see fit.
That's not a dangerous game, that's an excercise of the rights protected by the society they are part of.
I didn't have the time to maintain the project, so I needed to shut it down.
I want to bring it back.
I made it just for me, but it works well enough for recording outbound calls.
As mentioned in the article/paper, this attack vector has been used before.
The AT+USBDEBUG command was used to unlock the Samsung S6 Dec 10, 2015.
Blog about this exploit back then: https://www.bloglovin.com/blogs/xda-developers-5233323/2015-...
Video of the unlock back then: https://twitter.com/rpaleari/status/674983960162787328/video...
The code published by FICS here: https://github.com/FICS/atcmd/blob/master/usbswitch/usbswitc...
is based off the same code from Dec 2015 here: https://github.com/ud2/advisories/blob/master/android/samsun...
There is recurring monthly billing and I've never experienced any issues with their billing. Reference image: https://piqdd.com/fastmail.billing.screen.png
We need [Trump]'s administration to run Facebook.
We need [Trump]'s administration to run Amazon.
In 4 years, substitute your own -- no thanks.
No offense, Nick Srnicek, but please keep the authoritarianism on that side of the pond.
The mhacks.org site could use some work though:
- no password reset
- you lose your profile after saving it and re-navigating
Down for about 7 hours. Couldn't pick a better time to go down than Friday night at 11:48PM EST.
Thanks for the updates GitLab Team!
Starts at the middle of page 9.
It should read:
>> In this case, the Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled on this. You can see a map of the federal circuits here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_courts_of_appeal...
This PDF is worth reading over a couple times for full understanding. The topic is extremely relevant to each of our lives and thus quite tangible and easy to reason about.
The person in this case had to have a federal judgement made against him (the officers were granted qualified immunity [typical]) and THEN he had to appeal the case to obtain this judgement. A lot of work! (And I'm glad he saw it through!)
"The officers’ handcuffing Turner and placing him in the patrol car, as alleged in the amended complaint, were not reasonable under the circumstances. We conclude that a reasonable person in Turner’s position would have understood the officers’ actions 'to constitute a restraint on [Turner’s] freedom of movement of the degree which the law associates with formal arrest.'" Kudos to the judges for their sound judgement.
"Grinalds and Dyess are therefore not entitled to qualified immunity at this stage of the litigation on Turner’s Fourth Amendment claim that the officers violated his right to be free from warrantless arrest absent probable cause." Epic.
"Even if Turner had sufficiently alleged a constitutional violation, Driver acted objectively reasonably in light of the circumstances—namely, by apprising himself of the situation and acting accordingly. Driver is therefore entitled to qualified immunity on Turner’s Fourth Amendment claims." Fair and reasonable judgement.
The dissent is interesting and worth-reading. I agree regarding the First Ammendment findings, but I disagree with the arguments against the majority's Fourth Ammendment judgement.
For some understanding of how the Federal Judicial System works, it's worth watching this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_mbk0YhLa0.
The law that protects citizens from oppression from officers (as in this case) is United States Code: 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights. It's a short text and you can read it here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983 (Read it a few times over again to get a good idea of what is stated)
In this case, the Court of Appeals for the 5th District ruled on this. You can see a map of the federal districts here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_courts_of_appeal...
"When was the last time you downloaded an mp3?" I download MP3s all the time.
I use WinAmp and I love using WinAmp. Just wanted to add a different perspective.
Thanks for the recommendation though.
GitLab has always blazed their own trail with their transparency, whether through their open run books, open source code, or in this case their open problem resolution. Kudos to them in whatever manner they want to do it in (with or without names).
To be honest, through all of the comments, yours seems the most high-strung, and you're the one complaining about high-pressure situations like having your boss looking over your shoulder. Relax buddy. :)
For what it's worth, it was a lesson worth learning despite what seemed like catastrophic world-ending circumstances.
We survived, and GitLab will too. GitLab has been an extraordinary service since the beginning. Even if their repos were to get wiped (which seems not to be the case), I'd still continue supporting them (after I re-up'd from my local repos). I appreciate their transparency and hope that they can turn this situation into a positive lesson in the long run.
Best of luck to GitLab sysops and don't forget to get some sleep and relax.
If you have any questions or requests I'd be happy to help!
--
Here is my email:
Dear Nvidia,
I have been a life-long supporter since I was in college (14 years). I have recommended your products to many friends and purchased more than 15 of your graphics cards for my own computers. I build servers and run a cloud storage business. My friends and family look to me for advice on their own purchases. I am your target market - a technology leader that makes recommendations to others.
I have been extremely satisfied with your product for a long time and would like to be able to recommend your "issue-free" products to my friends, family, and associates. I'm a big fan of Nvidia.
-- Unfortunately, you have recently enabled telemetry reports (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12884762), and I will be less willing to recommend your product, opting for an AMD solution, or on-board solutions.
-- To resolve this issue, please:
1: Please use opt-in defaults instead of opt-out defaults for privacy-sensitive reports2: Make a blog post publishing your public policy on prioritizing user privacy over other priorities.
--
On a more general note, privacy issues will be an increasingly important consideration for technology leaders before making recommendations. Microsoft made a mistake integrating privacy-invasive telemetry into Windows 10. Please don't make the same mistake. Nvidia needs leaders that will prioritize user privacy over other market concerns.
Thank you,
David
As a matter of respect for the HN medium, you don't flag articles you simply "don't like". That said, this seems like important and relevant discourse.
While this article is technically "Off-Topic" [1]; with all the discussion over YC's Peter Thiel supporting Trump, I'd expect something as black-and-white as this to be non-controversial.