narayanbs

And who are you to certify?? Look at yourself first.

So basically, the feeling the tool gives you becomes more important than the task they are intended to perform.

Agree with you one hundred percent. I was more concerned about the way i use the fashionable office supplies than what my intention in buying them was in the first place.

> Pollution so think it seems like you could dish it up in a bowl. And it's that way at 30,000 ft, in a plane, flying between the two points.

What a load of bullc$ap. Even greta thunberg wouldn't make up things like this.

I apologize if i sounded condescending, and coming from a BFSI background myself, it was such a relief to write software systems in Java after years of C++. I agree "C++ code need not be complex", but the language itself is so designed that most often than not, you end up heading down a slippery slope.

Either you are confusing verbosity with complexity or you have never actually written a "complex" software in C++. There are too many things to think about while writing a piece of code in C++, most often than not, you are bound to get things wrong.

Being a veteran programmer,i find it funny how the article sounds like the stuff we used to read back in 2004-2005, during the heydays of spring and EJB.