156 karma · joined January 24, 2017
I agree the distinction is murky and can be easy to mock but at the end of the day something associated with these foods is making societies deeply sick and that should encourage us all to care about a solution. Even if you take a libertarian approach to diet, the economic cost of caring for a society with rampant obesity and diabetes impacts us all
Once we better understand what is driving the poor health outcomes we can work back and better classify problem foods and ingredients. Right now it’s all a bit unknown and doesn’t seem to have the right resourcing. There’s research that shows that UPFs are so simple that the body gets all the bad stuff in all its unfettered glory. Compare that to a date fruit, very high in sugar, but packed with fiber, the body metabolizes the date much more slowly, no sugar spike and gets some nutrition
Seems like navigation is ‘solved’? There’s already a lot of technology supporting permanence of virtual objects based on spatial mapping? Better AI generated animations?
I am sure there are a ton of innovations it could unlock…
Having said that it’s a good take, but after seeing how arbitrarily stocks rose in ‘21 I’m not too sure that rallies of household stocks are nothing more than emotional bets without any real strategy
I would love to see the government break of ticket master.better innovation to avoid scalping by a company that does not benefit from i. The banning of reselling on platforms that sell the original tickets. Caps on fees
I’m a higher earner who loves music and rarely go to stadium size shows because the costs for anything is typically $500+. How does that make any sense?
Basic math tells you the margin on a stadium seat is huge.
Other factors to consider: More is spent on marketing and promotion than ever before, but the cost of digital marketing is a fraction of marketing costs decades ago - especially with the ability to target fans.
The market is willing to bear these higher costs because experience are more valuable to generations today than 20+ years ago.
Artists are also complicit to an extent but reasonably so. The market for paid music has collapsed, touring is how you generate revenue as a musician
“Meanwhile, data scientists and statisticians who oftentimes lack engineering skills are now being pushed to write Python and “do AI,” often producing nothing more than unscalable Jupyter Notebooks”
Most data scientists are already well versed in python. There’s so many platforms emerging that abstract a lot of the infra required to build semi-scalable applications
It seems like the data journalism and data viz hype has passed and to a degree was more of a passing trend.
I remember the cost being high and it felt out of touch for who the user would be and who would be advocating for its use within a company. The pricing strategy felt very out of touch with my reality (from what I remember)
I was on tik tok today. I was fed a post that used an AI audio clip of Trump calling republicans dumb and stupid.
People thought it was real. They comment and believe it. The clip has been reused hundreds of time to make new posts. It will reach millions. This is one example.
There is government meddling in social media. It’s not always ours. That’s the MORE concerning part
The only issue was they were asking me to prove I was someone else (they sent an email to me, but referencing someone else’s name in the email).
They then locked me out because I didn’t respond fast enough and took that as suspicious activity.
When I tried to explain I couldn’t prove I was someone I was not, they tried to skirt the fact they had messed up.
Point being - banks need to protect our money, but banks make lots of silly mistakes that can ultimately harm the people they are trying to protect
Side note. This is some pretty terrible propaganda. The post about Kamala, immigrants and climate change barely makes any sense.
X just hosted trump for a live stream, who is being affected by a headline that reads ‘X censors trump tweet”.