892 karma · joined December 3, 2019
Bug fixes should get the same treatment. A patch is either correct or it isn't. Projects that ban AI-written fixes outright are asking "who wrote this?" instead of "is this right?", and users live with the bug in the meantime.
I get why maintainers are fed up. Review time is scarce, and they're drowning in plausible-looking garbage. But that's a problem with low-quality submissions, not with AI as such. Require tests, require a human who vouches for the patch and will answer for it, and ban repeat offenders. Then hold every patch to that same bar, whoever or whatever wrote it.
edit:typo
> macOS-native sandboxing for local agents. Move fast, break nothing.
[edit: but glass is not a simple fluid.]
We'll begin restoring access tomorrow, and will share an update soon.
We’re grateful to our users for their patience, and to everyone who worked with us on redeploying the models.
> Discovery of an unpublished manuscript by Mozart at the BnF: behind the scenes of an extraordinary operation
https://www.radiofrance.fr/francemusique/podcasts/l-invite-e...