671 karma · joined December 15, 2016
It's just a bit extreme considering you submitted it to HN, where the people directly involved actually have a chance of seeing it.
I hate this kind of writing. It undermines the otherwise good point the author has.
Long live email. Anything that replaces it will probably be a closed proprietary protocol and I don't look forward to that at all.
I think it would be really interesting if MS competed in that space. But 'nix sysadmins don't want to worry about maintaining a Windows instance concurrently with their server instances (assuming the only facilities they need are what 'nix provides). Microsoft having Windows attached to their Linux distribution is a net negative, in my opinion.
Edit: Formatting
I see it more as grasping at straws to stay relevant. The Ballmer-era FUD campaign was mostly a failure (and bad PR). "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em".
If you need a high quality Linux server, why not just run Linux?
Are you saying that supporting a presidential candidate is tantamount to "death to white men"? Yes, the candidate in question is abhorrent, but come on. Those statements absolutely don't carry equal weight.