Yum, soft hot dog stand!
12,616 karma · joined April 7, 2016
Fully agree. Facebook apps on Android can/could scan what apps are installed on the phone, and they could see if another social media app's install base was growing. He bought Instagram, he bought WhatsApp, he copied the Snapchat concept of "24 hour stories" when they refused the purchase.
TBH if I had the billions, I'm not sure I'd be any different (at least with the monopoly, I sure as hell wouldn't be blowing it on metaverse).
béton brut means "raw concrete" in French, and in architecture that's what brutalism is. I'd say only sites that look like they use the default style of HTML with no CSS on Netscape 1.x could be called "brutalist"...
E.g. https://stallman.org
IMO the design is more "Windows 3.1 Hot Dog Stand Theme" https://blog.codinghorror.com/a-tribute-to-the-windows-31-ho... combined with MS WordArt...
(And no, I don't know if they'll reach AGI, my uninformed bet is: no).
(Not actually sorry)
It does seem most widespread revolutions only happen when the discomfort grows big enough (as the saying (1) goes, "civilisation is n missed meals away from anarchy" (n = a number below 10, I thought 3, but it's 9)).
It's interesting though, the CCP does chicken out. The last time that I remember this happening is when enough citizens in Beijing protested against their prison-like Covid restrictions, that they relaxed it within a day or two.
Same thing with Russians and the war: 2). Heck, Americans are anguishing but most are too comfortable/don't want to go through the discomfort to actually do anything against the rising fascism in their country.
1) https://quoteinvestigator.com/2022/05/02/nine-meals/
2) https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2022/06/war-of-the-worl...
This post https://foxfire.blog/explorations/the-typewriter-that-became... claims "specific machine":
> The forensic science behind this was genuinely elegant. No two typewriters print identically. The mechanical tolerances of individual typebars—those metal arms that swing up to strike the ribbon—create unique signatures. Forensic document examiners look at three primary characteristics: alignment (whether a letter strikes slightly above or below the baseline), impression (whether one side of a letter prints darker than the other due to uneven wear), and damage (a chipped serif, a broken bowl on a lowercase “g”, a filled-in counter on an “e”). Taken together, these micro-imperfections form a pattern as distinctive as a human fingerprint—or so the authorities claimed.
> The East German Stasi took this principle to its industrial extreme. They maintained an exhaustive registry of type samples, a vast database of typewriter fingerprints. When a dissident pamphlet surfaced, the Stasi could compare its letterforms against their archive and, in theory, trace the text back to the specific machine that produced it. The countermeasure was ingenious in its simplicity: dissidents sought out pre-communist typewriter models—early Mignon or Ideal D machines manufactured before the registry existed. A typewriter without a file was a typewriter without a name. It could speak and not be traced.
Since they had control of commerce, I suppose it was possible to intercept every typewriter and "fingerprint" it before it is sold, or even tweak the typewriter to produce something unique (e.g. chipping a typebar so it prints a particular letter distinctly). Hah, needing to register your name/address to buy a typewriter feels spooky too. And if it gets stolen, you'd have to tell the authorities that it's no longer in your possession.
As a passenger I had my first go around a few days ago, but we were 5km away from the runway.
But this article portrays it differently: https://time.com/archive/6738066/the-truth-of-the-matter/
> In his strongest public statement, to 60 Minutes, [Richard] Clarke said Bush “ignored” the terrorist threat before 9/11. To the commission he testified, more soberly, that, for the Administration, it was an “important issue but not an urgent issue.” Clearly, the Clinton White House worried more. Clinton National Security Adviser Sandy Berger remembers telling his successor, Rice, during the transition that, for the Bush team, “the No. 1 issue that you’re going to be dealing with is terrorism generally and al-Qaeda specifically.”
> The record of the Bush Administration’s first half-year suggests its members didn’t buy it. They were more focused on Russia, China and especially missile defense. In his book Bush at War, Bob Woodward quotes Bush himself saying of Osama bin Laden, “There was a significant difference in my attitude after September 11. I was not on point, but I knew he was a menace … But I didn’t feel that sense of urgency.”
> Clarke’s strongest argument in this dispute is the pace with which the Administration considered the plan he proposed on Jan. 25, 2001 for combatting al-Qaeda. The program had evolved during the Clinton years, as al-Qaeda bombed U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998 and then the U.S.S. Cole in Yemen in 2000. The Bush team put the proposal through an April meeting of senior officials, took their time with it over the summer and finally brought it to Bush’s Cabinet-level security and foreign policy chiefs, who approved it, just a week before 9/11. None of that suggests it was a national-security priority.
What if the Hindus had said "we are vegans, please don't serve us meat" - probably reasonable enough, although I seem to recall some rightwingers getting angry about some other occasion where only vegetarian food was to be served.
Yeah, as a host I'd be fine with meeting their dietary restrictions; but would refuse their with staff gender restrictions. Somehow the management company didn't know where this acceptability border lied.
So to shake your head and think "Woke Europe" would be too simplistic.
I suppose the decisionmaker needs to know what societal values one has to uphold, and in which order of importance. As a wild example, if the group had demanded the women walk around in the nude, because of their religion, it'd be obvious to say no because it'd violate so many of the employees' values.
But I find it flabbergasting that in 2026 someone in the management thought it'd be okay to tell female staff to hide, just because some delegation demanded it. But for the tech-relevancy angle; They could've asked AI "Would this be fine?".
(Untested, presumably the AI would say "Merde! Non!")
So now Android strips location info when sharing an image to an app. A filter layer between filesystem and app, to add complexity to the whole system...
So e.g. opening a link to an Amazon product that a friend sent makes you a target for ads in that category.
It's a suspicion, they'd probably argue their EULA allows this. The typical "we have to monitor links for dangerous content" is always the standard bullshit.
Seems there's plenty of those around, on the left and on the right.. (there was a left-anarchist sabotage of power distribution in Berlin in winter)
And since the 2026 one is fresh, the 2027 one has a lot of hype and more FOMO for those who MO'ed.
Of course the supporters of one particular political party is much more better at gymnastics of the mental kind than the other side. Having no spine makes it quite easier...
I guess the Chinese government would do it quietly. Maybe Australia, Japan are doing something...
So, copy text to clipboard, press a hotkey to popup the menu, and it'll offer options depending on the detected text. For example changing the clipboard contents to prettified (if it detects JSON, XML, HTML), or formatting a number back and forth (e.g. working with SSN's out of numerical DB entries when they prefer AAA-GG-SSSS).
But this is barely "hacker news" so some "This is irrelevant!" experts will flag it to death...
Source: (1) https://www.ranker.com/list/paramount-movies/leah-collins
Even sending metadata so the client can use local sprites to render the enemy is hackable, if the end-user knows the coordinates where to render the enemy, it can immediately tell the server that "user aimed at $COORDS and pulled the trigger"...