Is there a reason stealing 20 years is realistic for a victimless crime? Poisoning someone actually has serious criminal consequences.
1,039 karma · joined September 2, 2016
That eventually forget why they are worshipping a language they no longer understand.
Billions of wallstreet speculative dollars to pump water out of the ground as fast as possible.
No one wins, but a percentage gain on a balance sheet.
It can upload and download whatever to your phone.
No other app is even close to allowed that.
And Japan and the Soviet Union had been at each others throats since before there was a Soviet Union and Japan thumped the tsar.
I am sure Japan did not want to surrender under a Soviet flag that was looking for 50 years of retribution.
In a strange way it was an American coup to get peace signed before Russia started stripping the place down to the bone.
They all had perfectly good reasons to not have to deal with the headache of losing money.
But that would require keeping the ad sales team they had on board and making a similiar product online.
But everyone got scared and lazy and saw a one quarter jump by dumping a bunch of staff.
Simple.
Uggg.
Their lack of customer support is border line criminal.
>The Copyright Act of 1790 was the first federal copyright act to be instituted in the United States, though most of the states had passed various legislation securing copyrights in the years immediately following the Revolutionary War. The stated object of the act was the "encouragement of learning," and it achieved this by securing authors the "sole right and liberty of printing, reprinting, publishing and vending" the copies of their "maps, charts, and books" for a term of 14 years, with the right to renew for one additional 14-year term should the copyright holder still be alive.
The point is. An under served population can be insighted with ideas from anywhere. But the root cause is still there in that community.