When you raise barriers to an activity, even if for a good cause, you may end up losing more than you gain.
2,601 karma · joined March 2, 2009
When you raise barriers to an activity, even if for a good cause, you may end up losing more than you gain.
For example employment laws are thought for big, ossified companies, not lean and agile startups.
So it's "unfair" when others work harder than us?!
> right to express discontent against the government
Last time I checked, the USA had "freer" speech than the EU.
At the end of the investing chain it’s always jobs, products and services - or bank deposits.
Any money not physically hidden in a cash vault or under a mattress takes part in the economy.
People are always able to recognize those providing value versus the ideologues…
So you either believe that people have agency and actually decide for themselves, or that they are puppets and democracy is a sham.
Almost nobody has been installing single-pane windows around here since early 00s. Double pane is the default. Location is Eastern Europe, if that matters.
And please make sure to visit some of the Eastern European countries, like Romania or Bulgaria too. They are part of the EU as well.
Europe "solved" inequality by effectively limiting the upper range. Meanwhile the lower tier is just as low (or lower) than in the US.
People would still rather emigrate to the poorest state of the USA than Bulgaria or Romania.
https://nltimes.nl/2024/11/15/dutch-childrens-channel-outage...
I thought so. I use Twitter daily and, for all its flaws, I think the "community notes" feature is pretty awesome. In fact, I like it so much I would enjoy having in on pretty much any information stream I receive.
Maybe I could even start following and possibly trusting legacy media again - if they would bother adding it.
Do you have an example of such flawed community notes? The ones I encountered were pretty sane and middle of the road, often correcting Elon himself.
I see Russian propaganda efforts are still going strong but so easily disproven in this day and age.
Pack up and leave, take refuge in other countries? Just give up and stay under the Russian boot, obey when taken to fight in meat waves against their neighbors?
What would you do in their place?
Which is not Russia advancing and occupying Eastern Europe at all. Nope. Just friendly neighboring acts.
If Putin ever gets tired of war, he seems to quicky recover and start again.
Government was overthrown in February 2014, the Ukrainian parliament renounced Ukraine's non-aligned status in December 2014 while Russia annexed Crimea in February/March 2014 and attacked Donbas in April 2014 - all while while Ukraine was still neutral and non-aligned.
> US regime change operation
I haven't seen any actual proof for that, only speculation like what you are linking to.
LE:
And you'd need some strong proof considering that everything that happened afterwards completely vindicated Ukrainian people's fear of Russia and their desire to get closer to the West.
As someone who lives in Eastern Europe and who also lived through a bloody revolution to get out from under the Russian boot - let me tell you: we don't need external influences to desire to live in peace and freedom, to pursue our happiness and prosperity. We are just like you, people of the West, in that regard. We don't want to live under Russian occupation any more than you do and we are willing to pay the blood price for the privilege.
Russian conquest wars in the last 30 years: Chechnya 1994–1996 and 1999–2009, Georgia 2008 (Abkhazia and South Ossetia) & Ukraine (2014 - today).
> Ukrainian neutrality lead to peace.
When Russians invaded Donbas in 2014, Ukraine actually had a non-aligned, neutral status. It only invited the Russians as they perceived it as weakness. Ukriaine's effort to join NATO was in hope of gaining a defense umbrella.
On the contrary, the risk of nuclear war increases when Putin gets Donbas and Crimea. Because what he wants next will be even more valuable to nations with nukes.
Appeasing sounds great but at some point you run out of other people's countries.
Literally every single western country who embraced free markets in the last 100 years did. Conversely their growth slowed the more they adopted leftist measures.
> zero reason to ascribe 100% of this to our socioeconomic system
My favorite A/B test was when Eastern Europe switched from communism to capitalism: we went from starving to plenty literally overnight.
> life of the median person is demonstrably worse
Please demonstrate it then. Statistics tell us the opposite.
> happiness in life. And isn’t that the metric we should actually give a shit about?
That is probably one of the worst metrics I can think about. How do you define it? How do you measure it? When do you measure it? How do you account for fluctuations? Delayed gratification? How to you account for the long-term vs short-term discrepancies? How to you account for self-induced unhappiness? Or artificial happiness through pills and other drugs?
The only worse metric I can think of is pleasure. Pursuit of either is a highly debatable individual strategy but for a society - it's deadly.
> opiate addict
Indeed, we don’t have the technology to save people from themselves, yet. I am sure kings of old didn’t either and addicts of their time fared even worse.
Many other socialist experiments happened in the world during the last 100 years. Take your pick - they all failed miserably compared to the amazing increase in prosperity of the USA.
> The USA wouldn't suddenly turn into Venezuela
I never said that, please re-read my post.
> Netherlands, Finland, Norway [...] haven't turned into Venezuela
They haven't turn into the economic power house the US is right now either. In fact, the whole EU is waking up to the fact that they're being left behind.
And they haven't "taxed the hell out of rich people", just slightly more. But coupled with just slightly more regulation, turns out the more socialism you impose on your economy, the less competitive it is.
And we're talking about much smaller countries, too - but not that flat actually. Sweden is ahead and Norway is just 3 spots behind USA in the billionaires-per-capita ranking, with Finland and Netherlands not that far behind.