4 karma · joined April 5, 2019
Do you have any suggestions on how this should be put forth to the user?
So, P2P for social networking won't work. For it to really work, a lot of nodes on the network will have to be online and the data will have to be stored on multiple nodes for the purpose redundancy. Imagine your photos being stored all over the web on someone's personal computer!
How do you propose that we store the data in this case? I can only think of storing it on some server in an encrypted form. Your thoughts?
To answer your question: Right now, the storage is provided by them. So, I don't need to worry about paying for a user's storage. It is on google. And as stated above, data can always be encrypted before storing.
Your data is pretty much all over the internet anyway. On HN news servers, your mail servers, etc etc. So, how do you decide who to trust and who not to?
=Timelines -- A social network that allows you to own your data.
=Share beautiful moments of your life with friends, family or the world.
=Easily customize who sees which post.
=Maintain ownership of your data at all times. Timelines stores your data in a specific folder on your Google Drive which is sandboxed from all your other data on Google drive.
=You'll need a Google account to use Timelines!
What do you guys think?
1)Giving the user an option of where they would want to store the data e.g. S3, box, dropbox etc. 2)Encrypt the data before sending it to google servers.
Timelines stores your data in a specific folder on your Google Drive which is sandboxed from all your other data on Google drive.
Check it out!