998 karma · joined August 16, 2009
http://maketecheasier.com/ubuntu-natty-beta-1-review-screens...
It is definitely not perfect and as is so common in open source it lacks polish. It abuses glow effects and is a bit non-intuitive in its finer details. However, it solves far more problems than its creating and is definitely a good change.
Whether it is a better change than Gnome Shell is another question and as I haven't used Gnome Shell I can only hope that one or both will push desktop usability ahead.
One cool feature they have is that it can listed installed apps as expected but also apps available in Software Center. Hopefully, someone can search for "draw" and get appropriate apps listed. Or for "GIMP" and either launch of install the app.
I guess it basically uses a secret/master password as a salt combined with a website's address or other identifier to create a pseudorandom password for that site. No need to sync a database or worry about corruption. I do wonder if there are any security issues unique to it but have not heard of any so far.
I wrote an iOS app for PwdHash called Hashed (http://hashedapp.com). There are also browser plugins for Firefox and Chrome and a bookmarklet for any browser called SuperPwdHash (http://cynix.org/tools/superpwdhash).
And no I'm not trying to troll.
OK, you got me.
P.S. Thank you Square! I will be (as always) recommending this to my family members who run their own business where a large portion of their revenue comes from trade show sales.
Or, optionally, stop acting like you, as a middle man, provides more added value than the developers that make your platform so damn profitable.
P.S. WebOS still looks pretty damn nice.
Still seems like Apple's "implementation" is overly broad in comparison since the iPhone is much more than an eBook reader. However, I am starting to question whether it is quite as "evil" as I have been thinking for the past few days.
As long as you wear a XL or smaller.
Joking! Don't flame. All hail Wheezy!
His four main points are: openness, momentum, cloud, and capability. Android is definitely more open than iOS but Android's power depends on non-open software/services (Google). Android definitely has momentum but at their current rate it will still take years to match the iPhone's share of the market. Also, the Android app economy appears to be much weaker due to a cultural issue (rather than critical-mass issue). Cloud is a bit misleading as you can integrate Google's services with an iPhone almost as well as Android and iOS/MobileMe probably matches Android/Google albeit with a increase in cost and perhaps privacy. Capability is balanced by lack of usability.
I still think people are excusing flaws in Android due to frustration with Apple, hoping for "open" to win, etc.
I recently tried to switch to the Nokia N900 (Maemo OS, soon MeeGo OS) but found its capability did not balance its lack of usability.