and the websites are usually justified in saying that.
26,018 karma · joined February 18, 2008
and the websites are usually justified in saying that.
this seems like a plenty cynical explanation. it's just a free trial to get developers building on their api.
used <10% of my 5hr limit on a $100 codex plan.
which does appear to say that yes, IANA hosts this
If you don’t have a mechanism for enforcing hard caps, you don’t get to send customers a bill for unlimited amounts.
but from what i can see, the american reaction to this, even from the anti-trump crowd within america, is to basically shrug and assume that canada will quickly forgive and forget.
the deal has a 30-day cancellation policy, and they raised a bunch of debt around the same time to fund their own datacenter expansion.
I gave the task to codex first, sol 6 xhigh. it took a couple back and forth prompts to define the project and then it worked for a bit and to took a couple more prompts before I decided it was good enough - not perfect, but close. It re-implemented some wrapper components in a simplified way that lost some of the UI, but it would work.
Opus 5.5 high took the same prompt with no back and forth, it just went off and one-shotted a tool that takes pixel-perfect screenshots of exactly what my app looks like.
only as long as you're trying to replace a human's job. because human jobs are structured to do a wide variety of things.
a useful agent needs a wide variety of inputs, and one single restricted action it can take. it doesn't need permission to do everything, it need permission to do the tiniest possible useful thing it can do, and nothing else.
they don't have 64% marketshare. they have 64% of openrouter usage, because people mostly don't use openrouter to access claude or chatGPT.
“Undesirable behavior” is overly broad to the point of being actively misleading, and gets you into sin taxes. smut or drugs are not the scarce resources anybody is talking about here.
if that were true, the millions of people who use these models that have had the alignment training applied would notice that. the reason we all believe that the models doing the hacking are models that haven't been told not to hack is because the models that are told not to hack don't do this.
and i think i was generally more tolerant of 5.1's writing style than most people.
have they ever shared anything about their revenue mix between consumer plans vs per-token billing? this is a revenue cut on their API billing, but they're not saying anything about increased limits on the plans. so all the plan revenue just got more profitable.
but how much of the revenue of the average law firm comes from that, vs the day-to-day "we need this relatively routine contract reviewed" sort of work?