And if you put it in private we will never know, but pinky promise. They would never steal training data
526 karma · joined April 10, 2021
Right now we have to Pay it ourself, and we are very aware that oai might use our research.
They claim that the default datasets contain so much cyber stuff, so that their models became quite good at it.
They filtered the data before training to not contain this. So it's not that they train the model to not do it. They rather not have it in the Corpus at all. In theory
If your always-on agent hears to wrong thing, you could lose access to things you depend on. The same reason makes GCP very unattractive.
I am happy for not maintaining a relevant open-source repo.
Otherwise I would expect Google would also wait with pixel updates
Are the ICC already terrorists, or not yet? Asking for a friend who doesn't want to get bombed.
Can someone tell me in simple terms why this doesn't conflict with the incompleteness theorems?
edit: thanks for the responses, i feel slightly less dumb now
Give it a year and it is outplayed by new agents. Shovel makes have to sell shovel's
Sign in via key is easy, not stuttering. I can recommend it.
Saying that one is enough is pretty arbitrary.
I understand "everything is political" more in a sense that we as a society have the burden to shape our own rules, and saying "I only live in the society, but ignore the burden of making rules" is not really possible. In that case you actively decide to let someone else decide for you.