98 karma · joined July 27, 2012
https://www.seriouseats.com/moka-pot-cheap-espresso-alternat...
So it was with interest that I observed my wife and MIL's reactions to the upgrade on their iPads, which was really no big deal at all.
A cogent reminder to me that there's a vast difference between us and them.
I'm sorry, but no such thing exists. :)
And now a few weeks later my inbox's without the tabs (phone and tablet) are a lot cleaner and more sane.
Newegg and Groupon and other mass marketers _have_ to hate this.
"(T)he primary problem with using market share as a measure of business health is it provides no insight into the profitability of the product being sold."
But other than that, the answer to "who is winning" is first defined by what goals the competitors are competing to reach.
If Androids goal is market share, and Apples goal is profit, both could be winning...and at the same time.
q: But can’t it be confusing having two operating systems?
a: Users care about applications and services they use, not operating systems. Very few people will ask you, “Hey, how come MacBooks are on Mac OS-X and iPhone and iPad are on iOS? Why is this?” They think of Apple as iTunes, iCloud, iPhoto...The picture may look different a year or two from from now, but in the short term, we have Android and we have Chrome, and we are not changing course.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/google-glass-googles-wearab...
I don't see how anyone who makes an open-minded choice can go wrong when selecting what best fits _them_.
I don't think you missed it; I think you dismissed or disagreed with it.
It's here: iOS has undeniably great, intuitive touch-based gestures and a straightforward layout.
And here: “It’s that simplicity, combined with a deep developer and app ecosystem, that really has given iOS its power with users.”
And here: One of the biggest benefits of the current iOS platform, from a developer standpoint, is that no matter what type of app you’re creating, you can find a few hundred existing examples of what works. And that isn’t always true on other platforms
For example, WNM Live CEO Brian Hamachek said when his company decided to create a Windows Phone app, there was “not much we could use as a basis for how it should be laid out, we had to come out with own path — which can be a little risky.” As for Android, Hamachek said it’s “like the wild west” and that there really isn’t much of a standard user interface to go off of, which isn’t good for devs or users.
Apple’s human interface guidelines make it easy create an app that looks and feels like an iOS app.
Hardware design is just one (of many) important characteristics in smartphone design. Of much greater importance is the balance across the different characteristics.
They are still selling every phone they can make, so I would guess no. The hardware, mostly the screen, needs some refreshing to be current with hardware on other platforms, but no, I wouldn't call it stale.
More like the media looking for something to talk about while waiting for the new, next iPhone to come out.
Awful.
"You start using it, I'll start my countdown to the service's death."
"The people who are getting the “Apple never did anything like this before” vapors from Apple’s throwing of sharp elbows in the direction of Samsung seem to forget that this is the same company that ran the John Hodgman/Justin Long “Get a Mac” campaign."
The N4 is lacking LTE. Maybe not a dealbreaker for some, but it is for me.
(for what its worth, Gruber backed the Pebble on Kickstarter: http://daringfireball.net/linked/2012/04/23/pebble-watch )