Also, there is no way this counterexample is wrong. You can very easily check it for yourself. (I did, I don't know why, obviously Levent wouldn't be wrong about this, but I guess I was in shock.)
3,339 karma · joined December 30, 2009
Also, there is no way this counterexample is wrong. You can very easily check it for yourself. (I did, I don't know why, obviously Levent wouldn't be wrong about this, but I guess I was in shock.)
You do not need to be on all 14 to find Beeper useful! Even if you only use a few you might still want them to be together in a single app. As to why you might be on several different chat networks, you might have different friend or family circles that use different chat networks and may have failed to convinced them to move to a single one or, like me, may think it is a bad use of time to even attempt to convince them to. I'm using Beeper for WhatsApp, Telegram, Facebook Messenger and Discord and it's great!
Oh, absolutely! I should have said before that I edited many file types in Vim on that netbook and syntax highlighting was lighting fast on all types except LaTeX. Sorry if I gave the wrong impression. Unfortunately for me, LaTeX is by far what I most wrote at the time, so it was an annoying problem.
> So, baffling discrepancies; I wish software performance was more predictable.
Amen to that! I've even been on the other side of this issue, with some Emacs packages I've written. I've received reports of some operations being very slow that I've been unable to reproduce (even though I continue to use underpowered hardware because I value battery life more than speed —I'm typing this, in Emacs, on a 10 year old Chromebook!).
The slowness I experienced for LaTeX files happened even without any third-party plugins installed, using a one-line .vimrc that only turned on syntax highlighting. So I think it is unfair to say "the slowness has nothing to do with Vim itself". Probably also "or the low power of the netbook" is unjustified, in the sense that the tips in :help tex-slow do likely solve the problem on computers a little beefier than my old netbook (which is probably more than 15 years old at this point). I mean, those suggestions are in the official Vim documentation presumably because they did work for someone.
Think of it this way: if the slowness of LaTeX syntax-highlighting were not a problem in Vim itself (where by "Vim itself" I'm including the vimscript files that ship with Vim, not just the executable), would it be documented in the official Vim documentation?
Also, I am constantly amazed at how concise K is, easily rivaling not only conventional languages but also much larger array languages like APL or J. Arthur Whitney's taste in selecting primitives is out of this world.
If the necessary temporary arrays are really huge, array programmers will just do the computation in chunks that fit comfortably in memory.
Close, they are called "idioms".
> +|x
The plus should be an asterisk, but yes, that is an idiom the ngn/k interpreter recognizes.
Grouping browser tabs is of course already handled by browsers, or you can use a window manager like i3, with the added bonus that i3 tabbed containers aren't limited to putting only browser windows in the tabs, but can include native application windows too.
The ability to add links to anything in your to do list I get from Emacs's Org mode —and probably even better than what is shown in the demo gifs: there you see adding a task from a sentence in an email, but it doesn't look like that also stores what email it came from, in Org mode you can easily set things up so that kind of that context is tracked automatically for you.
What really made me think is the Paste Calendar Availability feature! I need that all the time and it had never occurred to me to automate it.
For example MathJax!
Well, they did win a Pulitzer. That sounds like it would position them as a platform worth listening to and also like something that took some considerable effort.