104 karma · joined August 28, 2013
Similar evolution simulator with more complex 'physical' phenotypes.
Flying cars were a means to an end; we got a similar end, we just found a different means.
[0]: https://medium.com/@timrpeterson/140-characters-is-as-good-a...
First variation is with the candidates ability to solve the problem. Like you said, Microsoft and Google seem to have determined there's no correlation between that and job performance.
Second variation is with a panel of interviewers who propose the problem. Based on how the candidate responds, the panel chooses whether to 'hire' the candidate, based on their ability to reason about the problem and communicate, rather than on their ability to solve it.
I wonder if there's a correlation between the yes/no of the interviewers and the candidate's job performance.
If the internet of '03 could be described as 'rapid-fire content,' what can possibly describe the internet of today?
The list goes on and on.
I have plenty of time to do the things I want to do, but most of the time I just don't have the motivation to get started and just do it. It's easier to watch TV or play games than to exercise your brain learning something new. 'I don't have time' is an excuse.