444 karma · joined May 8, 2025
Socials: - github.com/paaloeye - x.com/paaloeye
---
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/paaloeye; my proof: https://keybase.io/paaloeye/sigs/NCzH9MXI5dw8kGxfh_oDd8u-sXsGk2vMNTixckq9ZoI ]
Most of those so-called awesome lists have zero to very little no human judgement when new projects are included. One example I found in the wild is [0], which has ca. 50 awesome projects already while libghostty isn't even stable. I doubt that even 10% of those projects are anywhere good, let alone _awesome_.
I, for one, would like to have an opposite — awful-<something>. Just so we know which things we should avoid. With AI, it's getting even more important to know what to use.
I bet in 5 years nobody will remember 95% of them.
It was catapulted to 8th rank while its "raw" was around 50th give or take.
If you need a GUI, just use a GUI.
Really? If we delete CC today, will humanity stop functioning? Nope. It's so far from one of the world's most important products.
About 5 9s, reliability is just one of the axes which suffers from fast generation.
There are a lot more: architecture, accuracy, etc...
> I have a feeling it’s possible to ship fast without drastic quality drops
at what scale and for how long?
With AI, keeping good quality gets even harder because it normally only produces tricky defects.