For “Germany”, the Spaniards say Alemania, the French say l’Allemagne and Arabic goes along with ألمانيا
221 karma · joined March 25, 2012
plaurent at me.com or gmail
https://pakl.net
The good news is the data is plentiful — it is all around (the robot). The real world — the robot’s umwelt sensed through its sensors and acted on by its actuators — will provide heaps of data.
Interestingly my colleagues propose that embodied learning will lead to grounding, alignment, and AI safety.
(Worked for 4 years at a robotics + machine learning startup, Director of R&D.)
(All too often the underspecified abbreviation “auth” is used to cover both.)
Shameless plug: My colleagues and I implemented a minimal authorization server that lets you leverage a trusted identity provider of your choice (like Entra ID or even Auth0/Okta) and handle authorization. It looks up what roles and permissions the identified user should be able to have/grant and issues tokens containing that authorization.
Anyway since we know that any part of neocortex can be reached from any other within 3 hops, and there is more feedback connectivity than feedforward connectivity in nearly every part of neocortex, it should be called a heterarchy.
Hierarchy is a handy metaphor/mental crutch from understanding primate social organization, not necessarily how the brain works.
No need to pass in the object explicitly, etc.
Doesn't have the greatest documentation, but has a full test suite (e.g., [1][2]).
[0] https://github.com/peterpaul/co2
[1] https://github.com/peterpaul/co2/blob/master/carbon/test/pas...
[2] https://github.com/peterpaul/co2/blob/master/carbon/test/pas...
There are plenty of identity providers out there who will worry about hashing passwords, resetting them, 2FA, etc. Most client businesses already have identities via one of those for all their employees (read: users of your APIs or apps).
Unfortunately nearly all of the open source solutions out there do exactly what you said, they start with (required) self-hosting authentication. Not helpful.
What’s more relevant to businesses is authorization using existing IdPs (shameless plug: https://github.com/DMGT-TECH/the-usher-server)
The problem he was proposing we solve is computing with heterogenous “machines”. This doesn’t preclude the regimented organization you are favoring, above.
Please see my other comment on call-by-meaning.
The most succinct way I have found to state the problem is: “For example, getting the length of a string object varies significantly from one language to another... size(), count, strlen(), len(), .length, .length(), etc. How can one communicate with a computer -- or how can two computers communicate with each other -- at scale, without a common language?” [1]
The call-by-meaning solution is to refer to functions (processes, etc) not by their name, but by what they do. VPRI provided an example implementation in JavaScript[0]. I re-implemented this -- a bit more cleanly, IMHO -- in Objective C[1].
[0] http://www.vpri.org/pdf/tr2014003_callbymeaning.pdf
[1] https://github.com/plaurent/call-by-meaning-objc?tab=readme-...
However there does not exist a theorem stating that those approximations can be learned (or how).
[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_approximation_theo...
Rather, embodied agents start with reference and indices. The hard problem is actually ungrounding — which takes work — to eventually get to things that approach what people typically think of “symbols”.
[0] https://bertrandlaurent.substack.com/p/monday-converting-soc...
https://www.crowdsupply.com/sutajio-kosagi/precursor/updates...
They would rather not deal with identity and authentication — usernames and passwords — at all. These are already quite nicely handled to various degrees by Cogntio, Auth0, Azure Active Directory, and others.
To address minimalist authorization needs, the portfolio of companies I worked with collaborated to create The Usher[1]. The Usher is an open source authorization server in NodeJS. Worth a peek if you, too, want to focus on authorization separate from authentication.
Disclosure: I am a contributor to The Usher.
Agreed. Authentication is quite a solved problem, the major focus for our portfolio of B2B companies is on authorization. They spend significant time on designing scopes which reflect and impact their business.
It is surprising that nearly every solution out there aims to handle both authentication and authorization. We choose to strictly separate these and delegate identity to established third parties or our customers[0].
We recently open sourced The Usher[1], our solution to part of the authorization problem. It is a minimalist server that issues access tokens based on roles and permissions looked up in a database (keyed by the identity token’s `sub` claim). Perhaps folks in this thread will find it useful!
0: https://dev.to/dmgt-tech/introducing-the-usher-an-authorizat...
All you have to do is answer a form with questions like: Do you know how to plug in a computer? Do you know where the power switches are on your devices? etc.
CSA Pre™ is valid for 5 years; you can initiate the renewal process to do 6 months before expiry.
> Learning multilayer convolutional representations of statistical features is roughly equal to taking few first few layers in visual cortex and stacking them.
No, it isn't roughly equal the first few layers of visual cortex. The first few layers of visual cortex have substantial feedback connectivity from higher areas which affects the responses of even the most peripheral parts. (Citations in our arxiv preprint linked above.). Most of the brain has more feedback connectivity from elsewhere than feedforward ascending connectivity. This qualitatively affects activations.
>We are essentially building a frog...
I suspect frog vision is far more robust than anything we are "essentially building".
> Features seem to exist independently...
Please have a close look at some modern visual neuroscience. Or speak to an good honest electrophysiologist.
It's intriguing how much focus there is on adversarial examples. You don't need adversarial examples to make a deep network fail - in a sense that's overkill. Just point the poor deep network at a sequence of images from the real world -- images from a self driving car, security camera, or webcam. You'll see it make spontaneous errors. No matter how much training data you gave it.
The field will advance when/if practitioners recognize that classifying pixel patterns in isolation isn't sufficient for robust visual perception, and adopt alternative neural network designs that can interpret what they perceive in light of (no pun intended) context and physical expectations.
It worked for our prototype.[0]
Recurrence can help with robustness in some other very important ways as well.
Citations for this dates from the 80s and 90s. I don't know the best reference offhand. You could look at some old Hinton stuff if you're a fan. Lots published on this.