578 karma · joined September 29, 2020
“At first the committee had intended to honour only Pierre Curie and Henri Becquerel, but a committee member and advocate for women scientists, Swedish mathematician Magnus Gösta Mittag-Leffler, alerted Pierre to the situation, and after his complaint, Marie's name was added to the nomination.[45] Marie Curie was the first woman to be awarded a Nobel Prize.[24”
> that were able to escape the influence of that star.
What's the mechanism here? Is it something with greater mass that pulled it into an escape?
What's the theory that predicted this? After billions of years, I would expect all planets be attached (gravitationally) to a star, shouldn't they?
> Indeed, a few years ago, Polish astronomers from the OGLE team from the Astronomical Observatory of the University of Warsaw provided the first evidence for the existence of such planets in the Milky Way.
Wait. Evidence is not the theory. Did they predict this or discover it?
That graph looks like a hockey stick. Is it really accelerating or are we just getting better at detecting it (this makes more sense)?
One question for me is how do they know which collision is BH+BH, BH+star, Or star+star? That sounds incredibly interesting detail
You're going to have to prove that. Your Android device doesn't send ALL your traffic to Google today. Using this would send ALL your traffic to Google. that 100% means it increases Google's ability to spy on you.
With that level of expectation, I'd expect you to encourage people to donate to the Wayback Machine / Archive
Essentially, require that Buy be Buy, and that the rights licensee can’t screw over the third party (consumers)
Not sure how to handle it I’d say VEVO declared bankruptcy tho
You’re right that this is madness. This PC nonsense needs to end. Not everyone can simultaneously be correct
I don't think a number is the right target here. Discoveries or theories might be a better goal, not just the number of papers published
This is incredible. Is there speculation that there could be a resevoir of ice underneath the soil? As in, could they dig a well and attempt to melt it (somehow) for collection?
If the servers are infected with malware, whose to say that the software isn’t infected to?
> technically impossible to conclusively assess the severity and the scope of the data breach.
They don’t know either