119 karma · joined December 22, 2017
My real point here is that this discussion specifically has been so thoroughly debated by brilliant people that I have trouble understanding why this hasn't been simply closed as proven like we do in math. Eventually you reach a level of argument where there is simply nothing left. We have reached it. Curtailing speech and thought simply never works as intended and always brings greater harms than the alternative.
What an embarrassing thing to even acknowledge.
Government on the other hand, has no such feedback loops and misaligned incentives which produce enormous fraud, waste, and abuse. There is no example of government being more efficient at any activity. Pick one, and there is a counter example in private industry doing it better for less.
Why would you imagine that this system would have justice or functioning courts?
This website is a cry for help and a great example on what happens to individuals when the brainwashing works.
Adding to that, you have some of the worst zoning and development practices in the modern world. Most of the country is simple a piggy bank for money laundering in the form of empty condo towers.
>...apocalypse fantasy, settler-colonial "rugged individualist" entitlement...
Is this based on any conversations with any of them? This reads like a fantasy and very at odds with the actual humans I have met who are "preppers."
Look around, find who gets the money and support. Decide if you can move there, accept it, or find a new company.
Don't get down on yourself or try to fix it. Neither is worthy of your time.
This person gave $100 so people could buy food.
Losing your job is not mild. This behaviour is not something we should encourage for anyone whether we agree with their views or not.
[1] - https://www.startribune.com/death-of-man-found-in-torched-mp...
It is not directly helpful (or unhelpful) to your point or to the parent as data doesn't seem broken down in that way. However, in all these sorts of discussions it would be really great if things had context. So, for example (and sake of argument) if someone says 800 children per day were admitted, we had a comparison. Is it high, low? How about a rate per 100,000 comparison across other countries? Not asking for anyone to do this, merely attempting to articulate my point.
A bit of eyeball math shows 12 million people in UK under 16. Even if 800 a day was true...should I worry?
Anyhow, thank you for moving discussion forward.
One way to search (and ignore random people like myself) for this, is to look for different countries treatment protocols (they are often published into other languages). There is a lot of serious people working hard trying to find good solutions.
Everyone's focus is to tear each other apart about which level of destruction is best for the non-vaxed. They are the problem and need to be crushed. Just excellent demonstration of media control and emotional manipulation.
Here we see the Germans following the leaders of human rights: China, Austria, Australia in preparing further legal frameworks to make the non-vaxed into non-people. Their futures will be fines, imprisonment and hopefully their lives permanently ruined. With cheers from the vaxxed.
After this we will be imprisoning or maybe just hanging from lampposts those who don't get enough boosters. For the safety of the children.
It is sort of funny that collectively, people whose minds are so good at synthesis and analysis never lifted their heads up to see what we were creating.
What would you tell you younger self to do instead?