pbackup12345

Hi there, it might be a good idea to clear this up early on the github page itself. This is a good idea, but I would not read on after the first page if I don't see that it checks my boxes for what I need. And as I can see it is still not really defining it.

Cool. That was it. Works now. Hats of to you. This has more uses than just typescripting. Actually you can spot in React apps, probably in other apps, too, the dependencies which break your code splitting.

That actually makes a lot of sense. To be honest just as an idea that also means that "early adopters" could also mean "first customers at a super low price". Probably less people wants to try something untried, yet, then people want to try something super cheap that they actually need. Also then you can go to your real market and not the market of "beta testers" which will not necessarily give you the correct audience. So one way to gain your first 100 people is probably to actually SELL IT, but at an extreme discount to your real future audience. I even offered a lifetime free licence for the first 100 sign-ups who starts using it. (You loose little as they don't necessarily use it later but they do jump to the free business.) I did even had a few friends of mine post it on their Facebook as an "ad". That of course means that the product has to be at least partially viable.

True but that gives the question: what does this type of wealth (on the stock market but factually even in estates) even mean? They do have stocks worth let's say 50 Billion, but this is all on paper. If they wanted to realize this money they would have to sell those stocks but there are just that many rich people on Earth who could buy those stocks. So if ALL wanted (or had) to use that money (existing on paper) there would be nobody to buy the stocks, and they would be worth nothing (or much less) immediately. So part of the whole stay rich scheme surprisingly has to be the fact of being only this rich because you try to preserve your wealth. If all of these guys would have to pay now 5% of their wealth then all of these people would have to sell 5% of their shares. But who would buy those shares then? So their shares would suddenly drop in value and they would have that much less money (on paper). So this whole operation is basically self-supporting and even if it's morally wrong, to be honest this wealth wouldn't even exist if not for these people having to preserve it.

What you say makes sense, but that gives the weird conundrum of whether only evil people would ever get that rich?

Well, technically this is a godsent. However when trying to run on some of my projects both javascript and my typescript it comes up totally empty as of now. Bug?

It's important to note that the Russians with all their automatic lies and confusion making already reached their goal. It takes a full Bellingcat investigation to prove something which is completely clear from the beginning. The Russians intended audience will never read the Bellingcat investigation or the other side, and they can always then just refer to their own lies spread around the internet. Kind of how all misinformation works.

What I really don't understand is the why of all this? Why do they avoid taxes in the first place? I believe it's just a sheer "supposed to do" and you get accountants and lawyers who try to be brilliant and that's their job. I mean what is the difference between having 8 billion dollars and 10 billion dollars at the end of the day? That's what I can never understand. They don't use this wealth for anything which is the real stupidity here.

But of course in a society which is kind of run by the stock exchange if everyone would try to USE their wealth, the stock exchange would collapse because everybody would try to sell. So basically what we are talking about is an illusion of wealth (not that I feel pity for billionaires) a good example of which is Musk trying to buy Twitter having to line up all kinds of investors while being the richest man on Earth. On that note the whole system is stupid as trying to USE your money is punished by high taxes while (theoretically) piling up money is rewarded.

This is something that will definitely have a market. I actually started to work in my bed because I hated sitting in the chair. I might not revert, but from time to time I felt that anything would be better than just sit there trying to shift positions. In fact I'm sure many people go to stores to look for "comfortable chairs". As a note you might want to try selling on AdWords with "butt pain" etc. as people do search for this, and there're no ads coming on these generally. If it helps with that, too it would sure be good to push it.